Search results
- When Columbia Pictures brought out the 2005 movie Stealth, Stoller attempted to force the movie studio to change the name of the movie or pay him royalties, but the studio responded by suing Stoller for declarative relief.
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Leo_Stoller
Jul 4, 2005 · Over the last few years, Leo Stoller has written dozens of letters to companies and organizations and individuals stating that he owns the trademark to "stealth." He has threatened to sue...
In March 2005, Leo Stoller, who claimed to own trademark rights to the word "stealth", served Columbia Pictures with a "cease and desist" letter threatening litigation if they did not rename the film to something "non infringing".
Oct 11, 2006 · And it rejected Stoller's puzzling contention that the STEALTH word mark is unregistrable because it is functional. However, Stoller's primary basis for opposition was likelihood of confusion. The Board found that Stoller had failed to establish use of his marks or ownership of any validly subsisting registrations.
Aug 25, 2005 · Can a man own a word? And can he sue to keep other people from using it?
When Columbia Pictures brought out the 2005 movie Stealth, Stoller attempted to force the movie studio to change the name of the movie or pay him royalties, but the studio responded by suing Stoller for declarative relief.
Apr 27, 2024 · In March 2005, Leo Stoller, who claimed to own trademark rights to the word "stealth", served Columbia Pictures with a "cease and desist" letter threatening litigation if they did not rename the film to something "non infringing". [9]
When Columbia Pictures brought out the 2005 movie Stealth, Stoller attempted to force the movie studio to change the name of the movie or pay him royalties, but the studio responded by counterclaiming against Stoller.
