Search results
When Madame Loisel took the necklace back to Madame Forestier, the latter said coldly: "You should have returned it sooner, for I might have needed it." She did not open the case, to the relief of her friend. If she had detected the substitution, what would she have thought? What would she have said? Would she have taken her friend for a thief
Quick answer: If Mathilde Loisel had not lost the necklace in "The Necklace," she would have continued to think of herself as a victim of fate, and the "heroism" elicited from her character...
Mathilde Loisel is responsible for her own suffering in "The Necklace" because her superficial, materialistic desires influenced her to borrow the diamond necklace in the first place....
Quick answer: At the end of "The Necklace," Madame Loisel changes into a humble, industrious woman, who no longer dreams about being rich and works hard for everything she earns. After losing the...
People also ask
Should Madame Loisel have returned the necklace?
What did Madame Forestier say when Madame Loisel took back the necklace?
Why is Mathilde Loisel responsible for her own suffering in the necklace?
How does Madame Loisel make his wife happy?
When Mme. Loisel took back the necklace, Mme. Forestier said to her, with a chilly manner: "You should have returned it sooner, I might have needed it." She did not open the case, as her friend...
When Madame Loisel took back the necklace Madame Forestier said to her with a chilly manner: "You should have returned it sooner; I might have needed it." She did not open the case, as her friend had so much feared. If she had detected the substitution, what would she have thought, what would she have said?
When Madame Loisel took back the necklace Madame Forestier said to her with a chilly manner: "You should have returned it sooner; I might have needed it." She did not open the case, as her friend had so much feared. If she had detected the substitution, what would she have thought, what would she have said?
