Search results
It is two different planets as it was in the original novel Monkey Planet and Mark Walhberg does end up back on Earth (not a duplicate Earth) in the current time. Apparently the time vortex works in reverse so that the first one in is the last one out. The space ship Oberon goes in last but has crashed thousands of years in the past.
- In lieu of finding anything official on the matter, my own interpretation of the film was that it did indeed take place on Earth throughout the sto...
- That's not earth that they're on during the body of the film. There are 2 moons in the sky above the ape encampment at the 1:01:15 marker.
- My interpretation of this is that the planet he was on throughout the movie is the same planet he lands on in the end. This has to be the case bec...
- In fact it's not confusing. For my analysis, the astronaut did not make it to go back to the real earth. He entered the wrong path, a sort of time...
Feb 13, 2024 · The Implication of Human Extinction. The ending of Planet of the Apes (2001) implies the extinction of humans, as Leo discovers the shattered remains of the Statue of Liberty on the ape-controlled Earth. This powerful visual symbolizes the downfall of humanity and serves as a cautionary tale against the dangers of war and the abuse of power.
- What Happens in Tim Burton's Planet of The Apes' Ending
- Did Leo Time Travel in Tim Burton's Planet of The Apes?
- Was Tim Burton's Planet of The Apes Set on Earth?
- What The Statue of General Thade Means
- What Happened to Pericles
- The Planet of The Apes' Themes Explained
- The Real Meaning of Tim Burton's Planet of The Apes' Ending
- Why Tim Burton's Planet of The Apes Changes Were So Divisive
- How The New Planet of The Apes Movies Fixed Burton's Mistakes
Leo Changes History In The 2001 Planet Of The Apes Remake
In Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes, Mark Wahlberg's Davidson discovers that his former crewmates crash-landed thousands of years before his arrival while attempting to rescue him, which seeded both ape and human life on Ashlar and formed the basis for the apes' oppression of humans. In Planet of the Apes' confusing timeline, Leo is then met by Pericles, the chimpanzee he followed into the storm at the beginning of the film. This ceases hostilities between humans and apes and allows Leo to use...
Mark Wahlberg Went Back In Time At The End Of The 2001 Planet Of The Apes
While the Tim Burton Planet of the Apes ending makes it far more confusing than was strictly necessary, the short answer is yes: Leo time traveled. His pod's console indicates that he crash-lands on Ashlar in the 51st century, and towards the film's climax, he returns to his own time in the 2020s. However, the film's General Thade twist makes this slightly more ambiguous, making it unclear whether his pod's console was entirely accurate.
The 2001 Remake Ignored The Coolest Part Of The Planet Of The Apes Premise
In the original film, the twist ending revealed the titular planet was Earth all along. However, Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes subverts expectations by taking place on another planet called Ashlar. Despite Burton's Planet of the Apes having talking humansand Earth-like conditions, its planet is shown to be a separate place on which life was seeded by the crash of the Oberon. The film's final scene shows Leo returning to Earth as guided by his pod's console, indicating that the apes also som...
Thade Followed Leo Through The Storm And Conquered Earth
The film's climactic scene reveals a huge memorial to General Thade, Tim Roth's human-hating villain. With very little context, one must look to Planet of the Apes' finer details to extrapolate its exact meaning. The inscription on the wall behind the statue indicates a possible explanation for a "gotcha!" moment more divisive than even M. Night Shyamalan's twist endings. The inscription explains that Thade saved apes from humans, hinting that he somehow came to Earth and conquered it and tha...
The Chimp Pilot In Tim Burton's Movie Probably Had A Happy Life
Perhaps the most charming of the 2001 Planet of the Apes' original characters was Pericles, the chimp pilot from the beginning and end of the movie. However, despite his sudden appearance in the film's climax saving Leo's life, Planet of the Apesleaves his fate ambiguous. He's left on Ashlar when Leo flies his pod back into the storm to return home, but his fate after that is largely unknown. From the societal change Leo has seemingly inspired on Ashlar, it's possible that Pericles is treated...
Animal Welfare Is The Core Of The Movie's Message
Like most Planet of the Apes movies, including the prequels, Tim Burton's film comes with an inherent message of animal rights.It explores most of the same ideas as the 1968 original, with one notable addition: the brief exploration of mankind's usual role as the aggressor. There's some societal commentary in the film as well, particularly regarding the apes' inhumane treatment of their human slaves.
The 2001 Remake Tried (And Failed) To Be Thought Provoking
With its confusing final twist, Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes ending gets a little messy. However, much of the film's Ashlar story is wrapped up nicely, and it's Leo's journey home that creates most of the film's narrative issues.Leo's abrupt realization that he has not returned home to the Earth he originally left is intended to be a horrifying and thought-provoking climax, but without the proper context, it's nothing more than a baffling final image. In an attempt to emulate the iconic en...
The 2001 Remake Couldn't Find The Balance Between Homage And Innovation
The reason Tim Burton's Planet of the Apes' changes were so divisive is mostly a matter of execution. The ending twist of Thade's statue was clearly intended to be as shocking as the original's Statue of Liberty, but as it came suddenly and without any context, it felt like nothing more than a cheap and confusing piece of mimicry or a lazy Planet of the Apes easter egg.However, the film's ending wasn't its only issue; it was just the final stinger in an otherwise disappointing remake. The rea...
The Modern Prequels Brought The Franchise Back To Its Roots
Unlike Burton's 2001 reboot, the Planet of the Apes prequel trilogy (kicking off with 2011's Rise of the Planet of the Apes) was a resounding success. The prequels are beloved by both fans and critics, and there's even a strong argument for them having bested the original movies. While that point might be debated in Planet of the Apes fan circles, there's no disagreement that the most recent Planet of the Apes reboot is far superior to Tim Burton's. The prequel angle certainly worked well for...
Apr 12, 2019 · The problem with PLANET OF THE APES(2001) is that it seems to mix the 1963 bookand the 1968 movieendings oddly together. Which only bewilders. And the ending then seems senseless. It ends with our hero leaving the foreign planet along with a newly established peace between humans and apes. When he lands back on Earth, all of Earth is run by Apes.
People also ask
What happened in the 2001 Planet of the Apes climax?
What does the ending of Planet of the Apes mean?
What's wrong with Planet of the Apes?
Is the 2001 Planet of the Apes a good movie?
Planet of the Apes star Tim Roth recently spoke with CraveOnline about his role in the critically acclaimed drama Selma. He was also asked about his role in the critically panned Apes remake, specifically about that ending. Which, as it happens, Roth wasn’t even in. But his likeness sure was, as a massive General Thade statue was set in place ...
Nov 3, 2009 · Leo arrives next, eventually locates the ruins of the Oberon. During the climactic battle scene of the movie, Pericles finally arrives too. Now we have everybody on the far side of the storm, and we move into hypothesis. Leo returns to Earth in his pod, through the storm.
Planet of the Apes is a 2001 American science fiction adventure film directed by Tim Burton from a screenplay by William Broyles Jr., Lawrence Konner, and Mark Rosenthal.The sixth installment in the Planet of the Apes film series, it is loosely based on the 1963 novel of the same name by Pierre Boulle and serves as a remake of the 1968 film version.
