Search results
If germany captures leningrad and moscow in '41 and stalingrad in '42, you would definitely still see an american landing in north africa. You would probably still see an allied landing in Italy. You might not see an allied landing in Normandy.
The odds would shift in favor of the Axis. Losing the city would basically shut down that entire sector and turn it into an unassailable German stronghold. Army Group North would have completed its most crucial objective. The capture of Leningrad would free up at least 16 German and 5 Finnish divisions for action elsewhere.
Jun 8, 2012 · Some historians have pointed to the German decision to advance along three axes: in the north toward Leningrad, in the south toward Ukraine, and in the center against Moscow. But the Wehrmacht had force enough to support three offensives, and its quick destruction of so many Soviet armies suggests that this was a reasonable decision.
- Mark Grimsley
Essentially everything from Stalingrad to Moscow to Leningrad would be occupied by Germany. Now this would disrupt energy food and labor supplies for the USSR. And the train lines to the region from the Urals and Siberia would be much more concentrated so Germany could focus on any Siberian units.
- German Forces Isolate Leningrad
- Hitler Chooses Starvation as A Weapon
- 1941-1942: A Winter of Desperation
- Hitler's Forces Finally Retreat
On August 31, the Germans seized the town of Mga, severing Leningrad’s last rail connection. A week later, they captured the town of Shlisselburg and cut off the last open roadway. By September 8, a water route via nearby Lake Ladoga stood as Leningrad’s only reliable connection to the outside world. The rest of the city had been almost completely ...
The memo stressed that requests for surrender negotiations were to be ignored since the Nazis didn’t have the desire to feed the city’s large population. Hitler had chosen a chilling alternative to advancing on Leningrad directly: he would simply wait for it to starve to death. By the time of Hitler’s directive, the Germans had already set up artil...
During the bitterly cold winter of 1941-1942, Leningrad was rocked by a starvation epidemic that claimed as many as 100,000 lives per month. “Is this my body or did it get swapped for somebody else’s without me noticing?” one man wondered. “My legs and wrists are like a growing child’s, my stomach has caved in, my ribs stick out from top to bottom....
The long-awaited breakthrough followed in early 1944 when the Red Army mobilized some 1.25 million men and 1,600 tanks in an offensive that overran the German lines. Like the rest of Hitler’s forces in Russia, Army Group North was soon pushed into a general retreat. On January 27, 1944, after nearly 900 days under blockade, Leningrad was freed. The...
And now the main question - how would have ended the Second World War if the Germans had captured Stalingrad? In my personal opinion, the war would still end with the defeat of Nazi Germany, but this took more time and, sadder, with much greater losses. But did the USSR have forces for this? Yes, it had!
People also ask
Why did Germany encircle Leningrad?
What happened in Leningrad in 1941?
Why did Germany bomb Leningrad?
How long did the Battle of Leningrad last?
In the southeast, the Germans captured Tikhvin on 8 November, but failed to complete their encirclement of Leningrad by advancing further north to join with the Finns at the Svir River. On 9 December, a counter-attack of the Volkhov Front forced the Wehrmacht to retreat from their Tikhvin positions in the Volkhov River line.
