Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. Retribution is based on the concept of lex talionisthat is, the law of retaliation. At its core is the principle of equal and direct retribution, as expressed in Exodus 21:24 as “an eye for an eye.” Destroying the eye of a person of equal social standing meant that one’s own eye would be put out.

    • Jon'a F. Meyer
  3. Nov 26, 2018 · The term “retribution” means, in the simplest sense, revenge. Retribution in the legal world refers to the act of setting a punishment for someone that “fits the crime.” In other words, an eye for an eye, or “do unto others as you would have done unto you.”

  4. Jun 18, 2014 · The idea of retributive justice has played a dominant role in theorizing about punishment over the past few decades, but many features of it—especially the notions of desert and proportionality, the normative status of suffering, and the ultimate justification for retribution—remain contested and problematic. 1.

  5. Jun 29, 2022 · Retributive justice is based on the theory that when people commit crimes, “justice” requires that they be punished in return and that the severity of their punishment should be proportionate to the seriousness of their crime.

    • Robert Longley
  6. That is, the primary goal of retribution (in its original form) is to ensure that punishments are proportionate to the seriousness of the crimes committed, regardless of the individual differences between offenders, other than mens rea and an understanding of moral culpability.

  7. Retributive justice is a legal concept whereby the criminal offender receives punishment proportional or similar to the crime . As opposed to revenge, retribution—and thus retributive justice—is not personal, is directed only at wrongdoing, has inherent limits, involves no pleasure at the suffering of others (i.e., schadenfreude, sadism ...

  1. People also search for