Search results
On Broadway, Design for Living was a popular and critical hit starring Lynn Fontanne, Alfred Lunt and Coward, and its risqué ménage-à-trois theme made it controversial. [4] [5] Design for Living was one of more than a dozen of Coward's plays made into feature films. [5]
Jan 17, 2012 · In Design for Living, Ernst Lubitsch crafted one of the most humorous pieces of the Pre-code era, also one of the most controversial. The film is a very loose adaptation of Noël Coward’s...
Feb 3, 2012 · What is “design for living”? According to the three protagonists of the film by that title, it sure as hell is not monogamy. Based on a play by Noel Coward, Ernst Lubitsch’s 1933 comedy about a ménage à trios was highly controversial but, nonetheless, a smashing hit.
Oct 5, 2023 · Controversial Content. Due to its explicit treatment of sexuality and unconventional relationships, the movie faced censorship challenges upon its release. Critical Acclaim. Despite the controversy, Design For Living was praised for its witty dialogue, sophisticated humor, and stylish direction. Box Office Success.
Design for Living playfully skips between three different attempts at a monogamous relationship with Gilda Farrell.
Feb 7, 2005 · The fourth claim in the design argument is also controversial: in the absence of any convincing non-design explanation, we are justified in thinking that real intelligent design was...
I just watched Design for Living (1933) for the first time last night and was absolutely blown away by its frank depiction of sex and freedom given to the female lead, played by Miriam Hopkins. I have not seen many other Pre-Code films from Hollywood, but seeing this one definitely makes me want to dive deeper into that era.
