Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Ingenious Media Holdings plc is an investment and advisory group, whose business includes the promotion of film investment partnerships. In June 2012, two journalists from The Times, Mr Alexi Mostrous and Ms Fay Schlesinger approached HMRC for an ‘off the record’ discussion about tax avoidance to inform their background investigations for a ...

  2. By Bonnie Eslinger. Law360, London (March 11, 2021, 9:52 PM GMT) -- Ingenious Media companies behind a film and video game finance scheme that has drawn the ire of Britain's tax authority urged an ...

  3. Oct 20, 2016 · Ingenious Media\'s recent victory over HMRC in the Supreme Court will give heart to the firm\'s lawyers preparing for a potential appeal in the case of its controversial film partnership schemes. Ingenious would love to repeat the win and overturn the decision on the partnerships which HMRC lawyers branded \'elaborate tax avoidance schemes\'.

  4. Aug 8, 2016 · HMRC had claimed that Ingenious Media Film partnerships tried to create artificial losses from backing a range of films, amounting to tax avoidance. However, the Tax Tribunal’s ruling is that ...

  5. Stewarts is acting for a number of investors in Ingenious Media’s film/game investment partnerships, after being branded as tax avoidance by HMRC. Group action begun on behalf of 220 investors who have together invested over £100m in cash – with losses thought to exceed that figure.

  6. Feb 9, 2018 · The decision from the First-tier Tax Tribunal in 2016 largely found in favour of HMRC and against Ingenious Media’s film/video game investment partnerships. While the main trial for this mammoth claim will not be heard until 2019, the first case management conference is listed for March of this year.”

  7. Oct 21, 2016 · The journalists used some of the information in a story for the Times. McKenna and Ingenious took legal action, claiming that HMRC had breached confidentiality. In 2013, the High Court rejected Ingenious’s claim on the basis it was off the record, and that Hartnett had “proper and lawful reasons” for disclosing the information.

  1. People also search for