Search results
Mozilla公共许可证. Mozilla公共许可证 （英語： Mozilla Public License ，简称 MPL ）是个 自由 、 开源 、详细的 软件许可证 ，由 Mozilla基金会 开发并维护。. 该條款融合了 BSD许可证 和 GNU通用公共许可证 的特性，追求平衡 专有软件 和开源软件开发者之间的顾虑。. [6 ...
1.7. ``Larger Work'' means a work which combines Covered Code or portions thereof with code not governed by the terms of this License. 1.8. ``License'' means this document. 1.9. ``Modifications'' means any addition to or deletion from the substance or structure of either the Original Code or any previous Modifications. When Covered Code is ...
Some similar questions are probably already answered here, but they answered for different licenses (like Apache-2.0). I would like to have a more understandable explanation about MPL-2.0 pros and cons in one place. licensing. license-compatibility. license-recommendation.
MPL is a practical license designed by Mozilla to enforce some kind of share-alike to the original library, while still encouraging people to make proprietary softwares and add-ons on top (including Mozilla itself), which is a practice that the FSF authorizes via LGPL but still considers harmful.
MOZILLA PUBLIC LICENSE Version 1.1. 1. Definitions. 1.0.1. "Commercial Use" means distribution or otherwise making the Covered Code available to a third party. 1.1. ''Contributor'' means each entity that creates or contributes to the creation of Modifications. 1.2. ''Contributor Version'' means the combination of the Original Code, prior ...
Mozilla公共许可证. Mozilla公共许可证 （英语： Mozilla Public License ，简称 MPL ）是个 自由 、 开源 、详细的 软件许可证 ，由 Mozilla基金会 开发并维护。. 该条款融合了 BSD许可证 和 GNU通用公共许可证 的特性，追求平衡 专有软件 和开源软件开发者之间的顾虑。. [6 ...
On 3rd January 2012, version 2 of the Mozilla Public License (MPL) was approved by the Open Source Initiative. It is also considered to be a Free Software licence by the Free Software Foundation. Like its predecessor, the Mozilla Public License v 1.1, it seeks to impose a moderate level of ‘copyleft’ restriction on adaptations of code that ...
