Search results
Oct 3, 2013 · The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) filed a lawsuit against two California firms, TOTE Fund LLC (TOTE) and MJS Capital Management LLC (MJS), and their principal Michael J. Siegel for misappropriating funds in connection with two commodity pools. According to the CFTC’s suit, between 2007 and 2010 Siegle collected nearly $1.4 million from about a …
Sep 26, 1989 · One class-action was filed last week in United States District Court in Chicago on behalf of Al Champ, a former customer of the Chicago-based Siegel Trading, said Michael Freed, a partner with one ...
Jan 19, 1995 · On February 28, 1994, the clerk of the court entered the court's judgment on the docket. Howard Siegel, Siegel Trading Co. and Mazza filed notices of appeal from the court's February 25, 1994 order. Howard Siegel's appeal was docketed as No. 94-1619; Siegel Trading Co.'s and Mazza's appeal was docketed as No. 94-1631.
Aug 7, 2023 · August 7, 2023 at 4:17 a.m. EDT. It’s obvious to most people that insider trading is cheating and ought to be a crime, though it can be difficult to prove and prosecute. Ivan Boesky and hedge ...
Nov 13, 2009 · On August 24, 1982, Martin Siegel meets high-powered stock broker Ivan Boesky at the Harvard Club in New York City to discuss his mounting financial pressures. Boesky offered Siegel, a mergers-and ...
Nov 26, 2018 · In particular, a negative review/story against Michael J Siegel which potentially hurt business and reputation. Here is an excerpt from that report – The CFTC has secured a court order requiring two commodity pool operators and their principal Michael J Siegel to pay restitution of USD104,684.47, disgorgement of USD86,503.36, and a civil ...
May 18, 1995 · Howard Siegel, Siegel Trading Co. and Mazza filed notices of appeal from the court's February 25, 1994 order. Howard Siegel's appeal was docketed as No. 94-1619; Siegel Trading Co.'s and Mazza's appeal was docketed as No. 94-1631. Intervenors Yerasi and Geer filed a notice of appeal which was docketed as No. 94-1795.
