Search results
People also ask
What is the main argument in Federalist No. 78?
What was the purpose of the Federalist No. 78?
What is the primary concern of Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78?
How does Federalist No. 78 define the judicial branch?
Jan 4, 2002 · The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary on the contrary has no influence over either the sword or the purse, no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society, and can take no active resolution whatever.
Hamilton argued that the judiciary was the least dangerous branch of the government and that it had the power to review the constitutionality of laws and actions. He claimed that the courts were the bulwarks of a limited Constitution against legislative encroachments and that the people's will was superior to the legislature.
Federalist No. 78 discusses the power of judicial review. It argues that the federal courts have the job of determining whether acts of Congress are constitutional and what must be done if the government is faced with the things that are done on the contrary of the Constitution.
Hamilton argues that the Supreme Court should have the power to declare unconstitutional laws null and void. He also explains how the judiciary should be independent and distinct from the legislative and executive branches.
Hamilton argues for a federal judiciary with independence, permanence, and authority to declare unconstitutional laws void. He explains the importance of judicial review in a limited Constitution and the danger of legislative supremacy.
Hamilton argues for an independent judiciary with permanent tenure and lifetime appointments to protect the Constitution from encroachments by the legislature. He claims that the judiciary is the weakest and most impartial branch of government, and that its role is to declare unconstitutional laws void.
Jan 27, 2016 · Federalist 78 is the first of six essays in The Federalist on the judiciary, all written by Alexander Hamilton (1755–1804). Writing under the pseudonym Publius, Hamilton tried to counter the concerns of the Anti-Federalists, particularly Brutus, that the Supreme Court would accumulate unchecked power.
