Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Geta_(emperor)Geta (emperor) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Geta_(emperor)

   • Cached

   Publius Septimius Geta (/ ˈ ɡ ɛ t ə / GHET-ə; 7 March 189 – 26 December 211) was Roman emperor with his father Septimius Severus and older brother Caracalla from 209, when he was named Augustus like his brother, who had held the title from 198. Severus died in 211, and although he intended for his sons to rule together, they proved ...

2. www.britannica.com › biography › Publius-Septimius-GetaPublius Septimius Geta | Brother of Caracalla, Assassinated

   www.britannica.com › biography › Publius-Septimius-Geta

   • Cached

   Publius Septimius Geta (born March 7, 189, Mediolanum [now Milan, Italy]—died Dec. 26, 211, Rome) was a Roman emperor from 209 to 211, jointly with his father, Septimius Severus (reigned 193–211), and his brother, Caracalla (reigned 198–217).

   • Author: The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica

3. Images

   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 
   • 

   View all

4. roman-empire.net › decline › getaGeta AD 189-211 - Graceful and Literate Emperor of Rome

   roman-empire.net › decline › geta

   • Cached

   Publius Septimius Geta (/ˈɡɛtə/ GHET-ə; 7 March 189 – 26 December 211) was a Roman emperor with his father Septimius Severus and older brother Caracalla from 209 when he was named Augustus like his brother, who had held the title from 198.

5. romanempirehistory.com › roman-emperors › emperor-getaEmperor Geta: Brother of Caracalla, Biography – Roman Empire

   romanempirehistory.com › roman-emperors › emperor-geta

   • Cached

   Nov 30, 2023 · Last updated on November 30, 2023. Emperor Geta, whose full name being Publius Septimius Geta, was a Roman emperor who played a significant role in the period of the Severan dynasty. He was born on March 7, 189 CE, and was the younger son of Septimius Severus and Julia Domna. His elder brother was Caracalla, and together they formed part of.

6. www.unrv.com › emperors › getaGeta - Roman Emperor | UNRV Roman History

   www.unrv.com › emperors › geta

   • Cached

   Learn about the tumultuous life and tragic death of Geta, the Roman emperor who was murdered by his own brother, Caracalla, in a power struggle for control of the Roman Empire.

7. Videos

   • 

     4:10

     youtube.com

     This is the story of Geta, from Emperor till his death.

     Apr 29, 2023

     844 Views

   • 

     0:11

     tiktok.com

     Who is the most tragic character of the Roman Empire? “Geta was the younger son of Septimius Severus by his second wife Julia Domna. Geta was born in Rome, at a time when his father was a provincial governor at the service of Emperor Commodus. During the campaign against the Britons of the early 3rd century, Septimus Severus entrusted his wife Julia Domna as his counsellor, his older son Caracalla as his second in command, and gave administrative and bureaucratic duties to his younger son Geta.

     Jan 30, 2024

     215 Views

   • 

     3:56

     youtube.com

     Part #15: CARACALLA and GETA | Compressed History of the Principate

     Oct 11, 2021

     144 Views

   View all

8. roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu › getaRoman Emperors - DIR Geta

   roman-emperors.sites.luc.edu › geta

   • Cached

   Aug 26, 1997 · Geta (211 A.D.) Michael L. Meckler Ohio State University. Publius Septimius Geta was the younger son of the emperor Septimius Severus. Geta's rivalry with his older brother, Caracalla, culminated in Geta's murder less than a year after Severus' death. Tradition soon idealized this victim of fratricide as a gentle prince taken by treachery far ...

9. www.ostia-antica.org › caracalla › familyCaracalla - Geta

   www.ostia-antica.org › caracalla › family

   • Cached

   Geta was still alive on 17 December 211 AD, a date that can be deduced from Dio's statement that Caracalla wanted to kill him during the Saturnalia, but could not (Dio 77,2,1). On 28 March 212 AD Caracalla is mentioned as sole Emperor in a papyrus from Antinoopolis in Egypt (P.Flor. III 318 + P.Lond. III 1164 a, line 19).