Search results
The United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyers' Edition, or Lawyers' Edition (L. Ed. and L. Ed. 2d in case citations), is an unofficial reporter of Supreme Court of the United States opinions. The Lawyers' Edition was established by the Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company of Rochester, New York in 1882, and features coverage of Supreme ...
- Florida v. J. L.
Full case name. Florida v. J. L. Citations. 529 U.S. 266 (...
- Lane v. Franks
Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme Court...
- Florida v. J. L.
Full case name. Florida v. J. L. Citations. 529 U.S. 266 ( more) 120 S. Ct. 1375; 146 L. Ed. 2d 254; 2000 U.S. LEXIS 2345; 68 U.S.L.W. 4236; 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Service 2409; 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3226; 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1642; 13 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 216. Holding.
- Kennedy, joined by Rehnquist
- Ginsburg, joined by unanimous
- Florida v. J. L.
Lane v. Franks, 573 U.S. 228 (2014), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving public employee's freedom of speech rights. Edward Lane sued Steve Franks for unfairly firing him, out of retaliation for sworn testimony Lane gave during a federal fraud case. [1] The Eleventh Circuit originally ruled in favor of Franks, “denying [Lane] first ...
- Thomas, joined by Scalia and Alito
- Sotomayor, joined by unanimous
- Edward Lane, Petitioner v. Steve Franks
CitationDRAPER v. UNITED STATES, 358 U.S. 307, 79 S. Ct. 329, 3 L. Ed. 2d 327, 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1607 (U.S. Jan. 26, 1959) Brief Fact Summary. Without a warrant, a federal narcotics agent (agent) arrested the Petitioner, Draper (Petitioner), as he disembarked a train.
L Ed 2d is a complete, enhanced, unofficial reporter of U.S. Supreme Court decisions since 1956, with convenient special research features not found in the official United States Reports.
- Print Book
Citation505 U.S. 577, 112 S. Ct. 2649, 120 L. Ed. 2d 467, 1992 U.S. 4364. Brief Fact Summary. The Defendant, Rachel Weisman (Defendant), alleges that a school sponsored, non-denominational prayer offered at a public school graduation violated the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution (Constitution).
Lewis v. Casey | Case Brief for Law Students | Casebriefs. Constitutional Law > Constitutional Law Keyed to Chemerinsky > Fundamental Fights Under Due Process And Equal Protection. Lewis v. Casey. Citation. 518 U.S. 343, 116 S. Ct. 2174, 135 L. Ed. 2d 606, 1996 U.S. Law Students: Don’t know your Studybuddy Pro login? Register here.
