Search results
Jan 30, 2024 · This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license, and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation.
My only assumption is that "contributor" means "entity" in this license. Quotes from MPL (most notably section 2.5): 1.1. “Contributor” means each individual or legal entity that creates, contributes to the creation of, or owns Covered Software. 2.1. Grants. Each Contributor hereby grants You a world-wide, royalty-free, non-exclusive license:
People also ask
What is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2 FAQ?
What is the Mozilla Public License?
What is a contributor version?
What is the difference between commercial use and contributor?
Mozilla Public License 2.0: Redline from MPL 1.1. Text that is red and struck through has been removed in MPL 2.0. Text that is blue and underlined has been added in MPL 2.0. Mouse over the highlighted text to get a further explanation of that change in the license. Note that these explanations are not the license.
Some similar questions are probably already answered here, but they answered for different licenses (like Apache-2.0). I would like to have a more understandable explanation about MPL-2.0 pros and cons in one place. licensing. license-compatibility. license-recommendation.
Aug 12, 2015 · Definitions. - 1.0.1. "Commercial Use" means distribution or otherwise making the. - Covered Code available to a third party. + "License" shall mean the terms and conditions for use, reproduction, + and distribution as defined by Sections 1 through 9 of this document. - 1.1.
The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird. The MPL license is developed and maintained by Mozilla, which seeks to balance the concerns of both open-source and proprietary developers; it is distinguished from others as a middle ground between the permissive software BSD-style licenses and ...
