Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. • 

     slideserve.com

     • Metaethical Moral Relativism (MMR). The truth or falsity of moral judgments, or their justification, is not absolute or universal, but is relative to the traditions, convictions, or practices of a group of persons.
     plato.stanford.edu › entries › moral-relativism

     Moral Relativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

2. People also ask

   What is meta-ethical relativism?

   • Meta-ethical relativism holds that moral judgments are not true or false in any absolute sense, but only relative to particular standpoints. This idea is essential to just about any version of moral relativism.

   Moral Relativism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu/moral-re/

   See all results for this question

   Do moral relativists support meta-ethical relativism?

   • Most moral relativists endorse some version of meta-ethical relativism. But meta-ethical relativism is not quite fully-fledged moral relativism; for one could consistently affirm it and still insist that one particular standpoint was demonstrably superior to all others.

   Moral Relativism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu/moral-re/

   See all results for this question

   Is moral objectivism a form of metaethical relativism?

   • The first point is a form of metaethical relativism: It says one morality may be true for one society and a conflicting morality may be true for another society. Hence, there is no one objectively correct morality for all societies. The second point, however, is a concession to moral objectivism.

   Moral Relativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/

   See all results for this question

   Why do metaethical Relativists argue that moral judgments lack moral authority?

   • Metaethical relativists generally suppose that many fundamental moral disagreements cannot be rationally resolved, and on this basis they argue that moral judgments lack the moral authority or normative force that moral objectivists usually contend these judgments may have.

   Moral Relativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/

   See all results for this question

3. plato.stanford.edu › entries › moral-relativismMoral Relativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › moral-relativism

   Feb 19, 2004 · The first point is a form of metaethical relativism: It says one morality may be true for one society and a conflicting morality may be true for another society. Hence, there is no one objectively correct morality for all societies. The second point, however, is a concession to moral objectivism.

   • Author and Citation Info

     We would like to show you a description here but the site...

   • Relativism

     It is customary to distinguish between descriptive or...

   • Metaethics

     Metaethics. First published Tue Jan 23, 2007; substantive...

4. openstax.org › pages › 8-3-metaethics8.3 Metaethics - Introduction to Philosophy | OpenStax

   openstax.org › pages › 8-3-metaethics

   • Cached

   Realism asserts that ethical values have some basis in reality and that reasoning about ethical matters requires an objective framework or foundation to discover what is truly good. For a realist, values are not simply subjective opinions.

5. iep.utm.edu › metaethiMetaethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu › metaethi

   • Cached

   Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words. Whereas the fields of applied ethics and normative theory focus on what is moral, metaethics focuses on what morality itself is.

6. Videos

   • 

     9:34

     youtube.com

     Metaethics: Crash Course Philosophy #32

     Oct 25, 2016

     2.1M Views

   • 

     6:20

     youtube.com

     Metaethics: Explaining the terms

     Nov 4, 2020

     28.2K Views

   • 

     8:26

     youtube.com

     Metaethics: An Introduction

     Jun 2, 2017

     78.7K Views

   View all

7. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › MetaethicsMetaethics - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Metaethics

   • Cached

   In metaphilosophy and ethics, metaethics is the study of the nature, scope, and meaning of moral judgment. It is one of the three branches of ethics generally studied by philosophers, the others being normative ethics (questions of how one ought to be and act) and applied ethics (practical questions of right behavior in given, usually ...

8. iep.utm.edu › moral-reMoral Relativism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu › moral-re

   • Cached

   Meta-ethical relativism holds that moral judgments are not true or false in any absolute sense, but only relative to particular standpoints. This idea is essential to just about any version of moral relativism.