Search results
- The relativist confuses cultural (or sociological) relativism with ethical relativism, but cultural relativism is a descriptive view and ethical relativism is a prescriptive view.
philosophy.lander.edu › ethics › relativism
People also ask
How does the ethical relativist derive support for his position?
What is the difference between cultural relativism and ethical relativism?
What is ethical relativism?
What is the difference between moral relativism and subjectivism?
Sep 11, 2015 · The sociological view that beliefs are context-dependent, in the sense that their context helps explain why people have the beliefs they do, has also been used to support what is sometimes called “social” or “sociological relativism” or the view that truth or correctness is relative to social contexts because we can both understand and ...
ethical relativism, the doctrine that there are no absolute truths in ethics and that what is morally right or wrong varies from person to person or from society to society. (Read Peter Singer’s Britannica entry on ethics.) Arguments for ethical relativism.
Feb 2, 2003 · Normative ethical relativism is the claim that what is right or just or virtuous or good only holds within, relative to, a particular ethical framework. Ethical (or moral) relativism is the topic of a separate entry, and we will only advert to it when it is helpful to note its similarities to, or difference from, other species of relativism.
Aug 1, 1992 · Ethical relativism is the theory that holds that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture. That is, whether an action is right or wrong depends on the moral norms of the society in which it is practiced. The same action may be morally right in one society but be morally wrong in another.
Edward Westermarck, 1932). In brief, psychological. Ethical Relativity (New York: Littlefield, Adams & Company, (or sociological) relativism is the empirical observation that moral behavior and the consequent morals differ among cultures, societies, and groups—both in the present and in the past.
- 224KB
- 16
Edward Westermarck, Ethical Relativity (New York: Littlefield, Adams & Company, 1932). [2] In brief, psychological (or sociological) relativism is the empirical observation that moral behavior and the consequent morals differ among cultures, societies, and groups—both in the present and in the past.
A. The ethical relativist often derives support for his position by two basic mistakes: 1. The relativist confuses cultural (or sociological) relativism with ethical relativism, but cultural relativism is a descriptive view and ethical relativism is a prescriptive view.
