Search results
People also ask
Where did the phrase 'equal but separate' come from?
Is “separate but equal” a sham?
Does the doctrine of'separate but equal' have a place?
Did Brown overturn the doctrine of'separate but equal'?
Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregation did not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which nominally guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people.
- English
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark U.S....
- Separate but Equal (film)
Plot. Cast. Critical reception. See also. References....
- English
Separate but equal, the legal doctrine that once allowed for racial segregation in the United States. The doctrine held that so long as segregation laws affected white and Black people equally, those laws did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.
Oct 29, 2009 · Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892...
Map of the United States, showing school segregation laws before the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education. Separate but equal was a legal doctrine that existed in the United States for 58 years. It was based on the United States Supreme Court decision Plessy v. Ferguson.
Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregation did not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which nominally guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people.