Search results
Jan 11, 2014 · However, Search and Destroy strategy, despite the help of superior American firepower and mobility, cost the lives of thousands of American servicemen without making any clear impact on the conflict. Flaws. Search and Destroy strategy had many flaws. First, there was no distinction between “Search and Destroy” and “Clear and Hold” missions.
Search-and-destroy missions had many flaws. First, there was lack of distinction between clearing and search-and-destroy missions. Thus, clearing missions, which were less aggressive, eventually morphed into a more violent and brutal form of tactic, just as search-and-destroy missions were. With the lack of distinction between clearing, and ...
People also ask
What were the flaws of the search and destroy strategy?
What were the flaws of search and destroy missions?
Was search and destroy a good strategy?
What does search and destroy mean?
Transcript. NARRATOR: In Vietnam, General Westmoreland's strategy was to fight a war of attrition. He called it "search and destroy." American forces would search out the enemy, make contact, and then, with superior numbers and firepower, destroy him. But Vietnam was a guerrilla war--with no fronts, no distinct lines of supply and communication ...
- 45 sec
Expert Answers. The whole strategy of search and destroy had negative impacts on everyone from the Vietnamese people to the American soldiers. It also had a negative impact on America’s ability ...
Besides avoiding the mis-understanding of search and destroy operations, the change expressed the difference between U.S. operations in the early stages of the war and those conducted during the ...
Mar 15, 2014 · Search and Destroy as a Failure. Search and Destroy was part of the attrition warfare and a major tactic used in the Vietnam War. For many people, Gen. Westmoreland, the commander of the Military Assistance Command, Vietnam (MACV), built up this tactic based on a naïve assumption that the war should be won by wearing down the communist’s ...
Search and destroy missions had many flaws. First, there was lack of distinction between “clearing” and search and destroy missions. Thus “clearing” missions, which were less aggressive, eventually morphed into a more violent and brutal form of tactic just as search and destroy missions were. With the lack of distinction between ...
