Answered Mar 11, 2010 · 31 votes
Personally, I feel that the "expressiveness" of a language really comes down to how clearly the language constructs can "express" the developer's intentions.
For example, I feel that C# (especially LINQ via C# 3+) is becoming much more expressive. This LINQ statement is a great example:
var results = collection.Where(item => item > 5);-
Without knowing the details of the language or the implementation being used, the developer intent is (in my opinion) very clear in the above statement.
I do not think that the verboseness of the language is equal to its expressiveness, however, there is some correlation in place. If a language requires a lot of code in order to express an abstraction, it is less expressive. These are two related, but different, concepts.
The same is true with power - although here a language's features (ie: power) must be complete enough to express the abstraction clearly. Without this, expressiveness will suffer. That being said, a language can be very "powerful" in terms of features, but not necessarily be expressive, if the feature set is difficult to understand.
Answered Jul 01, 2015 · 30 votes
"Expressiveness" means the ability to say only what you want done:
bad_event = events.find(&:bad)-
rather than how you want it done:
i = 0bad_event = nilwhile i < events.size && bad_event.nil? event = events[i] if event.bad? bad_event = event end i += 1end
Among the things that contribute to expressiveness are:
- A lack of required syntactic sugar
- First-class functions
- Garbage collection
- Either dynamic typing or type inference
- The language core not being slavishly minimalistic
- Good functionality in the standard library
To some degree, the expressiveness of any language can be increased by shoving as much "how to do it" off into subroutines/objects as possible so that most of the remaining code is "what to do." The amount of "how to do it" code needed in the most abstract code is one measure of a language's expressiveness: The more the code looks like pseudocode, the more expressive it is of the programmer's intent.
One can also think about the "meta-expressiveness" of a language: How expressive is the language at constructing Domain Specific Languages?
Answered Mar 11, 2010 · 27 votes
I like Matthias Felleisen's notion of expressive power, which is comparative:
- ["Language A is strictly more expressive than language B if both of the following are true:",""," ","Any program written in language B can be rewritten in language A while keeping the essential structure of the program intact.","Some programs written in language A have to be violently restructured in order to be written in language B."," ",""]
Usually we want to make these comparisons by looking at some kind of "essential core" of a language—for example, maybe we want to consider a dialect of C with only while and not also for and do...while. Or maybe we want to consider a dialect of Perl with only a prefix if form and no unless form. But sometimes these superficial syntactic distinctions are exactly what we mean by "expressive power"; to some programmers it's important to say
die ("found no solutions") unless length(solutions) > 0;-
if (length(solutions) == 0) { die("found no solutions"); }-
So you have to establish whether you're asking about expressive power of surface syntax or deeper structure.
The other thing I like about Felleisen's idea is that it admits of the notion of two languages which are definitely different, but neither is more expressive than the other.
You can read a more detailed exposition in the first two pages of his paper On the Expressive Power of Programming Languages. After that comes a lot of pointy-headed theory :-)
