Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. People also ask

   Is moral relativism A meta-ethical position?

   • Geoffrey Harrison argues that while moral relativism, properly understood, is essentially a meta-ethical position about morality, the claim that we should be tolerant is one made from within a particular moral point of view; the latter does not follow the former, therefore, since they belong to different levels of discourse.

   Moral Relativism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu/moral-re/

   See all results for this question

   What is metaethical relativism?

   • Although metaethical relativism is often depicted as embracing a valueless world of moral free-for-all, more sophisticated versions of the theory have attempted to place certain boundaries on morality in a way that still affirms the fundamental human-centeredness of values.

   Metaethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu/metaethi/

   See all results for this question

   Is moral objectivism a form of metaethical relativism?

   • The first point is a form of metaethical relativism: It says one morality may be true for one society and a conflicting morality may be true for another society. Hence, there is no one objectively correct morality for all societies. The second point, however, is a concession to moral objectivism.

   Moral Relativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/

   See all results for this question

   What is moral relativism?

   • The term ‘moral relativism’ is understood in a variety of ways. Most often it is associated with an empirical thesis that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements and a metaethical thesis that the truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to the moral standard of some person or group of persons.

   Moral Relativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-relativism/

   See all results for this question

2. openstax.org › pages › 8-3-metaethics8.3 Metaethics - Introduction to Philosophy | OpenStax

   openstax.org › pages › 8-3-metaethics

   • Cached

   Realism asserts that ethical values have some basis in reality and that reasoning about ethical matters requires an objective framework or foundation to discover what is truly good. For a realist, values are not simply subjective opinions.

3. plato.stanford.edu › entries › moral-relativismMoral Relativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › moral-relativism

   Feb 19, 2004 · The first point is a form of metaethical relativism: It says one morality may be true for one society and a conflicting morality may be true for another society. Hence, there is no one objectively correct morality for all societies. The second point, however, is a concession to moral objectivism.

4. plato.stanford.edu › entries › relativismRelativism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › relativism

   Sep 11, 2015 · It is customary to distinguish between descriptive or empirical, prescriptive or normative, and meta-ethical versions of moral relativism. These views in turn are motivated by a number of empirical and philosophical considerations similar to those introduced in defense of cultural relativism.

5. Videos

   • 

     9:34

     youtube.com

     Metaethics: Crash Course Philosophy #32

     Oct 25, 2016

     2.1M Views

   • 

     3:55

     youtube.com

     Ethics 101 Introducing Metaethics

     Mar 9, 2017

     9.4K Views

   • 

     8:26

     youtube.com

     Metaethics: An Introduction

     Jun 2, 2017

     78.3K Views

   View all

6. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Moral_relativismMoral relativism - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Moral_relativism

   • Cached

   Meta-ethical moral relativism holds that in such disagreements, nobody is objectively right or wrong. [1] . Normative moral relativism holds that because nobody is right or wrong, everyone ought to tolerate the behavior of others even when large disagreements about morality exist. [2] .

7. plato.stanford.edu › entries › metaethicsMetaethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

   plato.stanford.edu › entries › metaethics

   Jan 23, 2007 · Metaethics. First published Tue Jan 23, 2007; substantive revision Tue Jan 24, 2023. Metaethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological, presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice.

8. iep.utm.edu › metaethiMetaethics | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu › metaethi

   • Cached

   Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words. Whereas the fields of applied ethics and normative theory focus on what is moral, metaethics focuses on what morality itself is.

9. iep.utm.edu › moral-reMoral Relativism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy

   iep.utm.edu › moral-re

   • Cached

   Meta-Ethical Relativism. Normative Relativism. Moral Relativism. Arguments for Moral Relativism. The Argument from Cultural Diversity. The Untenability of Moral Objectivism. The Argument from Cognitive Relativism. Moral Relativism Promotes Tolerance. Objections to Moral Relativism. Relativists Exaggerate Cultural Diversity.