Search results
Devoid of merits
- Since there are disputed questions of fact, the FIR cannot be quashed in the light of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal [ (1992) Supp. 1 SCC 335 ]. In the result, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as being devoid of merits.
People also ask
Which apex court ruled in subhaga vs Shoba?
What are the facts of civil revision petition V ambulammal?
Who allowed civil miscellaneous appeal in CMA 46 of 1997?
Does ryotwari patta & 1972 sale deed contradict each other?
Dec 13, 2017 · Madras High Court R.Mohankumar vs Janaki on 13 December, 2017 Author: M.V. Muralidaran Bench: M.V. Muralidaran IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Reserved on 23.11.2017 Pronounced on 13.12.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.V. MURALIDARAN CRP(NPD)No.1812 of 2006 and M.P.No.1 of 2006 R.Mohankumar ..
12 hours ago · The Court also ruled that no proof must be required to validate a person's gender identity. Why This Ruling Matters The Madras High Court's decision will make it simpler for people to access the system's resources as they work to change their gender. Transgender people frequently find themselves unable to obtain gender-reaffirming surgery due ...
JUDGMENT Un Reportable. ORIGINAL PDF. Facts. Issues. Pet. Arg. Reasoning. Decision. S.MOHANKUMAR v. THE STATE REP.BY. Header page. Crl.O.P. No.5803 of 2021. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS. RESERVED ON : 28.06.2023. PRONOUNCED ON : 03.07.2023. CORAM. THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN. Crl.O.P. No.5803 of 2021. &
Feb 1, 2019 · 9. Continuing further, the Petitioner in fact had referred to the Order dated 01.03.2017 in W.P.(MD) No.18879 of 2016 between N. Rajesh Khanna vs The State of Tamil Nadu and three others, passed by the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court and enclosed a copy for consideration of the Second Respondent/Principal District Judge, Salem. 10.
2 days ago · Synopsis. Court held that the eviction of encroachers on waqf properties must adhere strictly to procedures outlined in the central legislation, the Waqf Act of 1995. The Madras High Court has held the Tamil Nadu Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Amendment Act 33 of 2010 void qua the Waqf Act, 1995 and hence ultra vires the ...
Aug 1, 2018 · JUDGMENT. ORIGINAL PDF. S.Mohankumar v. State. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to call for the records in FIR in Cr. No.164 of 2017 on the file of the first respondent police and quash the same. 2 For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to by their name.
8 hours ago · The Madras High Court on Friday refused to interfere with the decision taken by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and approved by the Centre, in November 2020 to amalgamate Lakshmi Vilas Bank (LVB ...
