Search results
- 2.0 and later: Yes (by default, unless marked as "Incompatible With Secondary Licenses")
en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_License
People also ask
What is the Mozilla Public License?
What is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2 FAQ?
Does the Mozilla Foundation have an open source license?
Does Mozilla have an open source license?
Jan 30, 2024 · This is the Mozilla Public License (MPL) version 2.0 FAQ. It aims to answer the most common questions people have about using and distributing code under the MPL. Please note that, while this FAQ is intended to be accurate and helpful, it is not the license , and may not cover important issues that affect you and your specific situation.
Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source/free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ .
Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license? Ask Question. Asked 4 years, 7 months ago. Modified 1 year, 11 months ago. Viewed 31k times. 29. I want to license my project (hosted on GitHub) under MPL-2.0, which looks like a reasonable choice. But since I'm not a lawyer, it's hard to estimate long-term benefits and consequences of this choice.
Often termed a “weak copyleft” license, MPL 2.0 falls somewhere in the middle. So, what makes Mozilla Public License 2.0 distinctive, and why might an OSS user or author like the MPL 2.0? We’ll address these questions and more below. Mozilla Public License 2.0 Requirements
Mozilla Public License; Author: Mozilla Foundation: Latest version: 2.0: Publisher: Mozilla Foundation: Published: January 3, 2012: SPDX identifier: MPL-2.0 MPL-1.1 MPL-1.0 (see list for more) Debian FSG compatible: Yes: FSF approved: Yes: OSI approved: Yes: GPL compatible: 2.0 and later: Yes (by default, unless marked as "Incompatible With ...
Jan 5, 2012 · The MPL 2.0 entry on our license list and Mozilla's own FAQ explain those terms in more detail. This approach to license compatibility is cleaner and more consistent than releasing software under multiple licenses. It can easily scale to support even more licenses—and MPL 2.0 does that by adding compatibility with AGPL version 3 or later. By ...
