Search results
Table of Contents. What is the relationship between the CPL and the EPL 1.0? Why was the EPL 1.0 written? Specifically how does the EPL 1.0 differ from the CPL? What is the latest version of the EPL. Do all Eclipse Foundation members approve of the EPL? How and when will the Eclipse Foundation transition from the CPL to the EPL 1.0?
- Eclipse Legal FAQ
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community, the...
- ECA
Eclipse Contributor Agreement. Version 3.1.0 January 14,...
- Licenses
Eclipse project committers can get help from the Eclipse...
- Eclipse Legal FAQ
- History of The Eclipse Public License
- Eclipse Public License: Key Provisions
- 1.0 vs. Epl-2.0
- Eclipse Public License vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
- Eclipse Public License: The Bottom Line
The original version 1.0 of the Eclipse Public License was based on IBM’s Common Public License (CPL). There were two primary differences between the CPL and EPL-1.0. 1. IBM served as the agreement steward for the CPL, while the Eclipse Foundation is the agreement steward for the EPL 2. The EPL removed the following sentence from the CPL that cover...
As a weak copyleft license, the EPL is a middle ground of sorts between permissive options (like the MIT License or Apache License 2.0) and strong copyleft licenses (like GPL v2 and GPL v3.) A core requirement of the EPL — one that’s not part of permissive licenses — is that derivative works of EPL-licensed code must also be licensed under the EPL....
As mentioned, there are four major differences between the original version of the Eclipse Public License (EPL-1.0) and the current EPL-2.0. 1. In contrast to the original, the EPL-2.0 is suitable for scripting languages such as JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Ruby, among others. This is because the EPL-2.0 both defines source code and requires source...
As mentioned, the Eclipse Public License has a lot in common with other popular weak copyleft licenses like the LGPL and Mozilla Public License 2.0, but there are a handful of notable differences.
As a weak copyleft license, the EPL fills a gap between permissive and strong copyleft licenses. Although the EPL doesn’t rival the MIT or Apache 2.0 Licenses in popularity, several well-known projects are licensed under it. These include: 1. Eclipse’s Jetty Project 2. Eclipse’s Golo Language 3. Clojure (licensed under EPL-1.0) 4. AT&T’s Software T...
People also ask
What is the difference between Eclipse SDK and EPL?
What is the difference between Eclipse Public License and EPL?
Are OSI-compliant licenses compatible with the Eclipse Public License (EPL)?
Is eclipse GPL compatible?
Jul 20, 2020 · Additionally, an EPL-ed component can only be released under the EPL. 9. What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and the BSD License? A developer can choose to distribute a BSD-licensed program as per his/her choice. The BSD license doesn’t impose the reciprocity clause either.
The EPL was based on the Common Public License (CPL), but there are some differences between the two licenses: The Eclipse Foundation replaces IBM as the Agreement Steward in the EPL; The EPL patent clause is revised by deleting the sentence from section 7 of the CPL
- 2.0
- EPL-2.0, EPL-1.0
- 24 August 2017
- Eclipse Foundation
1. Overview. 1.1. What is the latest version of the EPL? 1.2. What is the SPDX code for the Eclipse Public License, Version 2.0? 1.3. Why did the Eclipse Foundation create a new version of the EPL? 1.4. What are the major changes between EPL-1.0 and EPL-2.0? 1.5. Why should I Re-license from EPL-1.0 to EPL-2.0? 2. Secondary License. 2.1.
Mozilla Public License 2.0 vs. Eclipse Public License 2.0 (EPL) The latest version of the Eclipse Public License was released by the Eclipse Foundation in August of 2017. These two licenses have a fair amount in common, including that both allow for aggregate works to be sublicensed.
Apr 7, 2017 · EPLv2: A New Version of the Eclipse Public License. The Eclipse Foundation is in the process of revising the Eclipse Public License (EPL). Refreshing a popular open source license is a big job, and one that we have been chipping away at for over a year. The EPL and its predecessor the Common Public License have been around for about 16 years now.
