Yahoo Web Search

Search results

1. • • The MPL license is developed and maintained by Mozilla, which seeks to balance the concerns of both open-source and proprietary developers; it is distinguished from others as a middle ground between the permissive software BSD-style licenses and the GNU General Public License.
     en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_License

     Mozilla Public License - Wikipedia

2. People also ask

   What is the Mozilla Public License?

   • Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

   Mozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/

   See all results for this question

   What is the difference between MPL & Mozilla Public License?

   • MPL 2.0 works particularly well for programs that can use proprietary plug-ins (like some plug-ins to the Firefox browser). Mozilla Public License 2.0 contains an express patent license, but also some terms to clarify the scope of the license. It contains a disclaimer of implied licenses and also a strong defensive termination provision.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Does Mozilla have an open source license?

   • Open source software contributors, however, may also know Mozilla for its commitment to keeping the internet a free and public resource, a mission that matches the ethos of OSS development. It’s therefore no surprise that the Mozilla Foundation has created its own open source license, the Mozilla Public License.

   Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com/blog/open-source-software-licenses-101-mozilla-public-license-2-0/

   See all results for this question

   Does Mozilla use the MPL?

   • Most Mozilla software projects use the MPL, but some have different terms. Detailed information on the licensing of existing code can be found by inspecting its license headers, or by visiting the license information page in the relevant Mozilla software.

   Mozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org/en-US/MPL/

   See all results for this question

3. www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPLMozilla Public Licence — Mozilla

   www.mozilla.org › en-US › MPL

   • Cached

   About the License. Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source / free software license. The current version of the license is MPL 2.0 ( html | plain text ). If you want to use or distribute code licensed under the MPL 2.0 and have questions about it, you may want to read the FAQ.

   • Version 2.0

     Version 2.0. 1. Definitions. 1.1. “Contributor”. means each...

     Changes From MPL 1.1

     · Mpl-In-Gpl Developer Guidelines

     · Permissive-Code-Into-Mpl Developer Guidelines

     · Revision Process and Changes FAQ

   • MPL 1.1

     Mozilla Public License Version 1.1 1. Definitions. 1.0.1....

     Mozilla Public License Version 1.1

     · MPL 1.1 FAQ

   • Mozilla Licensing Policies

     The text of Mozilla websites is generally licensed under a...

   • Appropriate Header Text

     Mozilla License Headers This page gives copy-and-pasteable...

   • Historical Documents

     These files are made available for historical and reference...

   • MPL 2.0 FAQ

     About MPL. Q1: What is the Mozilla Public License? The MPL...

4. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_LicenseMozilla Public License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla_Public_License

   • Cached

   The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird.

   • Latest version: 2.0
   • Author: Mozilla Foundation

   • Published: January 3, 2012
   • Publisher: Mozilla Foundation

5. opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831licensing - Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license? - Open ...

   opensource.stackexchange.com › questions › 8831

   • Cached

   The MPL license is a copyleft license, which means that in principle people are not allowed to distribute code that is under the MPL-2.0 license under different terms. The GPL licenses (including LGPL and AGPL) require that the entire application is distributed under the terms of the GPL license.

6. Videos

   • 

     3:26

     youtube.com

     MPL (Mozilla Public License) Open Source license in a nutshell

     Jun 18, 2021

     4.4K Views

   • 

     4:25

     youtube.com

     Mozilla public license in hindi | advantages and disadvantage of mpl license | uses of mpl license

     Mar 10, 2022

     366 Views

   • 

     4:41

     youtube.com

     Mozilla and Working Open

     Apr 18, 2017

     4K Views

   View all

7. fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101Open Source Software Licenses 101: Mozilla Public License 2.0

   fossa.com › blog › open-source-software-licenses-101

   • Cached

   Mozilla Public License 2.0 contains an express patent license, but also some terms to clarify the scope of the license. It contains a disclaimer of implied licenses and also a strong defensive termination provision.

8. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › MozillaMozilla - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Mozilla

   • Cached

   NSS is licensed under the GPL-compatible Mozilla Public License 2.0. AOL, Red Hat, Sun Microsystems/Oracle Corporation, Google and other companies and individual contributors have co-developed NSS and it is used in a wide range of non-Mozilla products including Evolution, Pidgin, and LibreOffice. SpiderMonkey