Search results
Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the constitutionality of Section 1104 of the 1935 Social Security Act. In this Section, Congress reserved to itself the power to amend and revise the schedule of benefits.
People also ask
What did the Supreme Court decide in Flemming v Nestor?
Why did Nestor lose his insurance payments?
What happened to Ephram Nestor?
The case involved the constitutionality of a section of the Social Security Act that terminated old-age benefits for aliens deported for certain reasons. The Court upheld the section as a valid exercise of Congress' power to regulate immigration and social security.
Flemming v. Nestor. Media. Oral Argument - February 24, 1960. Opinions. Syllabus. View Case. Appellant. Arthur Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. Appellee. Ephram Nestor. Location. United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Docket no. 54. Decided by. Warren Court. Citation. 363 US 603 (1960) Argued. Feb 24, 1960.
Nestor challenged the termination of his old-age-insurance benefits. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that section 202(n) of the Act was unconstitutional because it deprived Nestor of an accrued property right.
Feb 21, 2024 · Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603 (1960), is a Supreme Court Case in which the Court upheld the Constitutionality of Section 1104 of the 1935 Social Security Act. In this Section, Congress reserved to itself the power to amend and revise the schedule of benefits.
FLEMMING, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, v. NESTOR is a case that was decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 20, 1960. The case was argued before the court on February 24, 1960. In a 5-4 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the ruling of the lower court.
Flemming v. Nestor was not the only motivation for “The New Property.” It was part of a series of cases in which authorities used control over privileges and benefits to punish non-conforming individuals.
