Search results
Apr 15, 2022 · That question was answered by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court last month when it ruled that Act 77, a 2019 law passed by the legislature that dramatically expanded mail-in voting, was...
www.politifact.com · factchecks · 2021Fact-checking Hawley’s claim about Pennsylvania’s election law
Jan 6, 2021 · Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri led the Senate charge against the electoral college certification of Joe Biden’s victory. Much of his argument was based on changes to mail-in voting in Pennsylvania.
Searches related to arguments for compulsory voting laws in pennsylvania
Feb 21, 2024 · Compulsory Voting Arguments: Pros. In the United States, citizens have a right to vote. Some people suggest that voting is a civic duty. But there are no legal repercussions if an eligible voter chooses not to cast a vote. The argument over compulsory voting is still largely theoretical in the United States.
- Why Did The Court Strike Down The Mail Voting Law?
- What Did The Dissenting Judges Say?
- What Does This Mean For The May Primary?
- Who Brought The Challenge?
- Why Are Lawmakers Challenging A Law They passed?
- What’s The Difference Between A Law and A Constitutional Amendment?
- What’s The Likelihood An Amendment Would Pass?
- What Are Legal Experts Saying?
Three of the five Commonwealth Court judges — all Republicans — decided that no-excuse voting would require an amendment to the state constitution, one that would explicitly permit any voter to request a mail ballot regardless of the reason. The constitution currently states that voters have to cast ballots at a polling place within their district....
Two Commonwealth Court judges elected as Democrats, Michael Wojcik and Ellen Ceisler, wrote in their dissent that the majority is wrongly lumping in no-excuse mail voting with the language in the constitution allowing absentee voting. The two pointed to another section of the constitution that empowers the legislature to “provide for another means ...
That remains to be seen. The Wolf administration has already appealed the decision to the state Supreme Court. As that process plays out, the mail voting law remains in place. If the court accepts the case, which is widely expected, legal experts and others believe it will decide the matter swiftly, given the proximity of the May primary and the ne...
Doug McLinko, a county commissioner from Bradford County, filed a lawsuit in July challenging Act 77. A similar suit was brought by a group of Republican state lawmakers the following month, including 11 who voted to approve mail voting when the law was first passed: 1. Mike Jones (R., York) 2. Barry J. Jozwiak (R., Berks) 3. Kathy Rapp (R., Warren...
The mail voting law was the result of months of negotiation between Wolf and the Republican-led legislature, but at the time, the issue of constitutionality was hardly front and center. Importantly, the law didn’t just permit no-excuse voting, it also ushered in other changes, including moving voter registration deadlines closer to the election and...
Unlike traditional bills, amending the state constitution is a time-consuming process. First, the legislature has to approve a proposed amendment in two consecutive sessions (each legislative session lasts two years). Once that happens, then voters get to decide the matter through a ballot question.
In the majority decision, the Commonwealth Court judges noted that no-excuse mail voting has so far been popular. They posited that, if a constitutional amendment was presented to the voters, it “is likely to be adopted.” But in order for a proposed amendment to even begin moving through the legislature, it needs the support of Republican leadershi...
Bruce Ledewitz, a Duquesne University professor and a state constitutional expert, said if the high court takes the case, “it will be a close legal question.” Though voting rights advocates excoriated the Commonwealth Court decision Friday, Ledewitz said both sides have raised valid legal arguments, and he doesn’t expect the high court, if it accep...
- Investigative Reporter
Apr 20, 2018 · Mandatory voting, often referred to as “compulsory voting,” is a structure where the laws of a nation require eligible citizens to register and vote in elections. If the voter chooses not to vote, then penalties can be imposed if a sufficient reason for not voting cannot be provided.
Jan 28, 2022 · In a 3-to-2 decision, the state court sided with 14 Republican lawmakers who sued last year, arguing that the law was unconstitutional. Pennsylvania filed an appeal to its Supreme Court on...
People also ask
Is Pennsylvania's mail voting law unconstitutional?
Is compulsory voting a good idea?
Is mail-in voting illegal in Pennsylvania?
What is mandatory voting?
Oct 23, 2015 · One of the major arguments given by those against compulsory voting is that it leads to a greater number of uninformed voters, noting that those who choose not vote are generally less educated on political issues than those who choose to vote. Critics argue that the resulting surplus of politically ignorant voters has three main negative ...
