Search results
- When a political system actively prevents or limits the expression of dissenting opinions or opposing views. This can be done through censorship, propaganda, intimidation, or even violence.
library.fiveable.me › key-terms › ap-govSuppressing Opposing Views - Vocab, Definition, and Must Know ...
Jan 26, 2022 · A new paper examines decades of research on receptiveness to opposing views, offering insights into how to evaluate other people’s opinions and why some discussions — even when the goal is civil discourse or idea sharing — explode into angry arguments.
People also ask
Is government action viewpoint based?
Are viewpoint-based restrictions unconstitutional?
Is a law designed to suppress a particular viewpoint?
What is viewpoint discrimination?
Aug 10, 2023 · Viewpoint discrimination is a form of content discrimination particularly disfavored by the courts. When the government engages in content discrimination, it is restricting speech on a given subject matter.
A law can discriminate on the basis of viewpoint even if it is viewpoint-neutral on its face. In assessing whether a facially neutral law nevertheless discriminates on the basis of viewpoint, the Supreme Court has asked whether the law, in its “design” or “operation,” favors or disfavors a particular point of view. 1.
A law that explicitly regulates speech on the basis of the particular ideas or opinions expressed is said to be viewpoint-based “on its face.” 1. Such facially viewpoint-based laws, which are unconstitutional in most contexts, 2. can take several forms.
Definition. When a political system actively prevents or limits the expression of dissenting opinions or opposing views. This can be done through censorship, propaganda, intimidation, or even violence.
Jul 10, 2020 · Yes, it is important to censure harmful and offensive speech. But there are ethical costs to widening the scope of our moral outrage to viewpoints that merely differ from our own.
Opposing viewpoints are presented on various aspects of the legal system, including the jury system, civil justice system reform, litigation, the fairness of the criminal justice system, and the role of the media in the courtroom.
