Search results
- Currently, twenty-two states are adopting preventative models, which are meant to commit potentially dangerous individuals and reduce recidivism by committing patients who are most likely to deteriorate.
blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu › 2016/03/09 › involuntary-outpatient-commitment-in-the-usInvoluntary Outpatient Commitment in the US - Bill of Health
Usually, these proceedings might be initiated when a patient poses a danger to themselves or others due to mental illness, is unable to meet their basic needs, or is gravely disabled. All 50 states have laws regulating long-term involuntary commitment.
People also ask
Do states use involuntary outpatient commitment laws?
Can involuntary commitment to psychiatric treatment prevent unwarranted commitment?
What are involuntary commitment laws?
Will involuntary outpatient commitment underserve people who voluntarily seek treatment?
Involuntary commitment laws vary from state to state. Learn how these laws outline the criteria, procedures and duration of involuntary commitment for people who are living with substance use disorders.
Very few states make use of involuntary outpatient commitment (Asssited Outpatient Treatment, AOT) laws. When inpatient commitment is used, most states still rely on the “dangerousness” standard, and rarely use the other standards they have available to them.
Grading the States: An Analysis of U.S. Psychiatric Treatment Laws examines the laws that provide for involuntary treatment for psychiatric illness in each state. To do so, we asked a crucial […] TAC Report
Three states still have no law allowing civil commitment to occur on an outpatient basis (AOT) (Connecticut, Maryland and Massachusetts). Tennessee’s AOT law is the only one written to prevent its use as an alternative to hospitalization.
While MHA recognizes that involuntary treatment may sometimes be necessary, we do not support the use of outpatient commitment except in the narrowest circumstances. Mental Health America recognizes that there are limited circumstances when involuntary commitment must be used as a last resort.
A record of involuntary commitment can affect other rights, too, notably the right of private citizens to possess firearms; federal and state laws limit this right specifically for persons with a history of commitment or other mental disability-related adjudications.