Ad
related to: proof of jesus resurrection - apologetics and historyWhat do the scriptures teach us about the Resurrection? Find out how the resurrection fits into God's plan of salvation
Search results
Sep 12, 2007 · The historical evidence for the resurrection of Christ is very good. Scholars such as William Lane Craig, J.P. Moreland, Gary Habermas, and others have done an especially good job of detailing that evidence. 1 It is the aim of this article to offer a sort of synthesis of some of their key points and show the strength of the historical evidence ...
Jul 2, 2008 · The case for the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus seems to me to rest upon the evidence for three great, independently established facts: the empty tomb, the resurrection appearances, and the origin of the Christian faith.
- Stephen S. Jordan
- Early accounts. The majority of scholars believe that the crucifixion of Jesus took place in 30 A.D. The four Gospels were written within just a few decades of the death of Jesus (70-95 A.D.
- Eyewitness accounts. According to 1 Corinthians 15:3-8, over 500 people saw Jesus alive, in addition to Peter, James, Paul, and the rest of the disciples.
- Extra-biblical accounts. The events surrounding the resurrection of Jesus are mentioned by numerous individuals (Christians and non-Christians) from outside the New Testament.
- Embarrassing details. When dealing with historical events, one piece of evidence that lends credibility to an account’s authenticity is the inclusion of embarrassing details.
People also ask
How many evidences are there for the resurrection of Jesus?
What evidence is there for the historicity of the resurrection?
Does 'the case for Christ' prove the historicity of Jesus' resurrection?
What is the historical apologetic for the resurrection?
In this lesson, you will gain insight into the historical evidence supporting the resurrection of Jesus, including the crucifixion, discovery of the empty tomb by women, early and multiple accounts of Jesus's appearances, and the transformative impact on the disciples, ultimately challenging alternative explanations and asserting the ...
Jan 20, 2024 · The Historical Evidence: A Scholarly Critique. The Historical Significance of Jesus' Resurrection. We begin our exploration with a narrative overview, drawing from the canonical Gospels to reconstruct the story of Jesus’ death, the discovery of the empty tomb, his post-resurrection appearances, and eventual ascension.
- Jesus’s Death and Burial. Contemporary historians are virtually unanimous in their acceptance of Jesus’s death on the cross.5 His death by crucifixion is the single fact most mentioned in all the historical records of his life, both Christian and non-Christian.
- The Empty Tomb. Second, the New Testament Gospels claim that the tomb of Jesus was found empty on the Sunday following his crucifixion. While this claim is not universally affirmed, a recent survey of three decades’ worth of academic literature shows that it was accepted by the majority of scholars who wrote on that subject.11 The strongest piece of evidence in favor of the historicity of the empty tomb is the report that it was discovered by women.
- The Belief of the Apostles. Third, the followers of Jesus claimed to have seen him alive after he had been executed. They did not claim to have seen him only once or for a short time; they claimed to have seen him repeatedly over an extended period of several weeks.
- The Conversion of Paul. Fourth, the conversion of Paul is an important datum reported in the book of Acts and by Paul himself in several of his New Testament letters.
Apr 12, 2020 · 1. There are four ancient biographies of Jesus. They were all written by eyewitnesses and/or based on eyewitness testimony. They were written and circulated while many other eyewitnesses were still alive. These biographies all say that Jesus rose from the dead.
