Search results
Oct 17, 2003 · Runaway Jury. Drama. 127 minutes ‧ PG-13 ‧ 2003. Roger Ebert. October 17, 2003. 4 min read. The case involves a widow who is suing a gun manufacturer because her husband was killed in an office massacre involving an easily-obtained weapon.
- 12 Angry Men
The story is based on a television play by Reginald Rose,...
- Minority Report
The year is 2054. Futuristic skyscrapers coexist with the...
- 12 Angry Men
Searches related to runaway jury movie synopsis summary
Summaries. A juror on the inside and a woman on the outside manipulate a court trial involving a major gun manufacturer. Wendell Rohr is a torts lawyer taking on the gun lobby. Rankin Fitch is the jury consultant for the Defendants and between them the battle is for the hearts and minds of the jury. But there is someone on the inside.
Runaway Jury is a 2003 American legal thriller film directed by Gary Fleder and starring John Cusack, Gene Hackman, Dustin Hoffman and Rachel Weisz. An adaptation of John Grisham 's 1996 novel The Runaway Jury, [2] the film pits lawyer Wendell Rohr (Hoffman) against shady jury consultant Rankin Fitch (Hackman), who uses unlawful means to stack ...
Runaway Jury: Directed by Gary Fleder. With John Cusack, Gene Hackman, Dustin Hoffman, Rachel Weisz. A juror on the inside and a woman on the outside manipulate a court trial involving a major gun manufacturer.
- (106K)
- Crime, Drama, Thriller
- Gary Fleder
- 2003-10-17
Oct 17, 2003 · When a young widow in New Orleans brings a civil suit against the powerful corporate consortium she holds responsible for her husband’s murder, she sets in motion a multi-million dollar case.
- Gary Fleder
- 20th Century Fox
After a workplace shooting in New Orleans, a trial against the gun manufacturer pits lawyer Wendell Rohr (Dustin Hoffman) against shady jury consultant Rankin Fitch (Gene Hackman), who uses...
- (162)
- Mystery & Thriller, Drama
- PG-13
Synopsis. A member of the jury for an explosive trail against a gun manufacturer joins forces with a beautiful woman to manipulate the panel. With millions of dollars at stake in the precedent-setting lawsuit, the mysterious jurist finds himself battling a high-priced and ruthless jury "consultant" who will stop at nothing to secure a verdict.