Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jul 26, 2016 · The 1954 Johnson Amendment should be repealed because of its infringement upon the Freedom of Speech and because the Internal Revenue Service neither has the authority to determine what may be said within churches, nor does it enforce the law with any sort of logic or continuity.

  2. 1 day ago · Congress approved an amendment banning political activity from tax-exempt organizations, including charities and churches, authored by then-Sen. Lyndon B. Johnson in 1954.

    • Why Is Political Speech in Churches Back in The News?
    • What Is The Johnson Amendment?
    • What Does The Law Say?
    • Was The Johnson Amendment Intended to Separate Church and State?
    • Is The Ban Constitutional?
    • How Often Do Pastors Mention Candidates from The Pulpit?
    • Should Churches Even Be Endorsing Candidates from The Pulpit?

    Last week, at the National Prayer Breakfast, President Trumpvowed to repeal the lawthat restricts political speech from the pulpit. “I will get rid of, totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear,” Trump told the audience. The day before, Republican members of Congress introduced the...

    In 1954, Senator Lyndon Johnson was running for re-electionin his home state of Texas and faced a primary challenge from a millionaire rancher-oilman. A non-profit conservative political group published material recommending voting for Johnson’s challenger. To get back at this group, Johnson subsequently introduced an amendment to Section 501(c)(3)...

    According to the Internal Revenue Service, Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or pu...

    No, in fact, many legal scholars claim that Johnson had no intention for it to apply to churches. The effect on religious organizations was merely the collateral effect since they held the same non-profit status as groups whose speech Johnson wanted to limit.

    As law professor Robert W. Tuttle notes, some legal groups would claim that the law violates both the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, which prohibits the government from regulating religious organizations more strictly than their secular counterparts, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a 1993 federal statute that prohibits the feder...

    Pastors mentioning candidates—at least presidential candidates—by name from the pulpit seems to be a rare occurrence. Last year Pew Research Center conducted a survey to find out how many churchgoers have heard their clergy speak about particular candidates. Only about one-in-ten say they have heard direct support for (9 percent) or opposition to (...

    Many Christians have a natural aversion to the politicization of the pulpit. But even those who think it might not be prudent recognize that danger in allowing the government to decide what can and cannot be said in churches. Russell Moore, president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission and a TGC Council member...

  3. May 9, 2019 · Johnson, a Texas Democrat, was the Senate minority leader in 1954 when he proposed this restriction. It was approved without committee hearings or debate under a Republican majority and...

  4. Dec 21, 2018 · Jacob Lupfer. (RNS) — As the 115th Congress winds down amid chaos in Washington, one unsettled debate concerns a long-uncontroversial line added to Section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code...

  5. In 1954, two wealthy Texans had used tax-exempt organizations they headed, the Facts Forum and the Committee for Constitutional Government, to support a young state senator who opposed Johnson in that year’s primary election. Johnson won handily but was reportedly incensed that two tax-exempt entities had opposed him.7.

  6. People also ask

  7. The amendment is named for then-Senator Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas, who introduced it in a preliminary draft of the law in July 1954. In the early 21st century, some politicians, including former President Donald Trump , have sought to repeal the provision, arguing that it restricts the free speech rights of churches and other religious groups.

  1. People also search for