Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Jun 29, 2023 · Washington — The Supreme Court's landmark decision rejecting affirmative action in higher education prompted sharp dissents from two members of the court's liberal wing, Justices Sonia Sotomayor ...

    • Politics Reporter
    • 7 min
    • CBS News
  2. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: No, because --MR. SAUER: -- purpose. JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR: -- immunity says, even if you did it for personal gain, we won't hold you responsible. What do you -- how could that be? MR. SAUER: That's an extremely strong doctrine in this Court's case law in cases like Fitzgerald, the heartland, Johnson and supports

  3. Jul 1, 2024 · FILE - Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor attends a panel discussion, Feb. 23, 2024 in Washington. The Supreme Court allowed a president to become a “king above the law,” in the use of official power, Sotomayor said in a biting dissent Monday, July 1, that called the majority opinion on immunity for former President Donald Trump “utterly indefensible.”

    • lwhitehurst@ap.org
    • Criminal Justice Reporter
  4. Jun 27, 2022 · Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan join, dissenting. This case is about whether a public school must permit a school official to kneel, bow his head, and say a prayer at the center of a school event. The Constitution does not authorize, let alone require, public schools to embrace this conduct. Since Engel v.

  5. Jul 1, 2024 · PUBLISHED 7/1/2024 by Roxanne Szal. “With fear for our democracy, I dissent,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor concluded in a scathing dissent, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Donald Trump greets Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Stephen Breyer after addressing a joint session of Congress on Feb. 28, 2017.

    • Roxanne Szal
  6. Johnson, Nos. 20–15, 21–1, 21–2 (Jan. 12, 2021). Judge Motz dissented from the denial of stay based on Johnson’s First Step Act claim, explaining that the applica-tion of the definition of “covered offense” “present[s] diffi-cult and important issues necessitating adequate consider-ation by this court.”. Id., at 9.

  7. People also ask

  8. sotomayor, j., dissenting supreme court of the united states nos. 20–1199 and 21–707 students for fair admissions, inc., petitioner 20–1199 v. president and fellows of

  1. People also search for