Search results
Apr 17, 2016 · The lives of the eight clergymen were deeply influenced by the times and the Letter itself. (Though none of those eight ever actually received the Letter, and King did not know any of...
- Chris Bodenner
Jul 14, 2013 · Although initially addressed to eight “liberal” Alabama clergymen, the letter gained a wider audience once published in the June editions of Christian Century magazine and Atlantic Monthly. In his letter, Dr. King insisted on the need for immediate racial change and the absolute necessity of protest until change occurred.
King also decried the inaction of white moderates such as the clergymen, charging that human progress “comes through the tireless efforts of men willing to be co-workers with God, and without this hard work, time itself becomes an ally of the forces of social stagnation” (King, Why, 89).
A vigorous, eloquent reply to criticism expressed by a group of eight clergymen. by Martin Luther King Jr. June 12, 1963. My dear fellow clergymen: While confined here in the Birmingham city jail I came across your recent statement calling my present activities “unwise and untimely.” Seldom do I pause to answer criticism of my work and ideas.
In ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’, King answers some of the criticisms he had received from the clergymen in their statement, and makes the case for nonviolent action to bring about an end to racial segregation in the South.
Dec 16, 2021 · King forces the clergymen to contemplate the morally upright response in the face of unjust laws. Martin Luther King Jr. then justifies his advocacy for what some might consider an "extremist" cause by citing historical examples of other "extremist" causes that ultimately led to positive change.
People also ask
How does an Atlantic reader relate to the eight clergymen?
How did King respond to his 'fellow clergymen'?
What did Birmingham clergy say about the 'white clergymen urge' campaign?
How does King answer the clergymen's objections?
“Letter from Birmingham Jail” is written in response to the public criticism of King’s actions by eight white clergymen, unnamed in the text. The letter’s first half responds to the specific complaints these critics lodge.
