Search results
What is the relationship between the CPL and the EPL 1.0? Why was the EPL 1.0 written? Specifically how does the EPL 1.0 differ from the CPL? What is the latest version of the EPL; Do all Eclipse Foundation members approve of the EPL? How and when will the Eclipse Foundation transition from the CPL to the EPL 1.0?
- Eclipse Legal FAQ
The Eclipse Foundation - home to a global community, the...
- ECA
Projects The Eclipse Foundation is home to the Eclipse IDE,...
- Licenses
Projects The Eclipse Foundation is home to the Eclipse IDE,...
- Eclipse Legal FAQ
- History of The Eclipse Public License
- Eclipse Public License: Key Provisions
- 1.0 vs. Epl-2.0
- Eclipse Public License vs. Other Weak Copyleft Licenses
- Eclipse Public License: The Bottom Line
The original version 1.0 of the Eclipse Public License was based on IBM’s Common Public License (CPL). There were two primary differences between the CPL and EPL-1.0. 1. IBM served as the agreement steward for the CPL, while the Eclipse Foundation is the agreement steward for the EPL 2. The EPL removed the following sentence from the CPL that cover...
As a weak copyleft license, the EPL is a middle ground of sorts between permissive options (like the MIT License or Apache License 2.0) and strong copyleft licenses (like GPL v2 and GPL v3.) A core requirement of the EPL — one that’s not part of permissive licenses — is that derivative works of EPL-licensed code must also be licensed under the EPL....
As mentioned, there are four major differences between the original version of the Eclipse Public License (EPL-1.0) and the current EPL-2.0. 1. In contrast to the original, the EPL-2.0 is suitable for scripting languages such as JavaScript, PHP, Python, and Ruby, among others. This is because the EPL-2.0 both defines source code and requires source...
As mentioned, the Eclipse Public License has a lot in common with other popular weak copyleft licenses like the LGPL and Mozilla Public License 2.0, but there are a handful of notable differences.
As a weak copyleft license, the EPL fills a gap between permissive and strong copyleft licenses. Although the EPL doesn’t rival the MIT or Apache 2.0 Licenses in popularity, several well-known projects are licensed under it. These include: 1. Eclipse’s Jetty Project 2. Eclipse’s Golo Language 3. Clojure (licensed under EPL-1.0) 4. AT&T’s Software T...
People also ask
What is the difference between Eclipse SDK and EPL?
What is Eclipse Public License (EPL)?
What is the difference between Eclipse Public License (epl-1.0) and EPL-2.0?
What is Eclipse SDK?
The Eclipse Public License (EPL) is commonly used for business software.With EPL, software developed using EPL, non-EPL, and even proprietary code can be combined and sub-licensed – provided any non-EPL elements reside independently as separate modules or objects.
Jul 20, 2020 · Contents hide. 1. What are the terms and conditions of the Eclipse Public License? 2. Is it considered a copyleft license? 3. What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and IBM’s Common Public License (CPL)? 4. What is the difference between the Eclipse Public License and the GNU GPL? 5.
The EPL was based on the Common Public License (CPL), but there are some differences between the two licenses: The Eclipse Foundation replaces IBM as the Agreement Steward in the EPL; The EPL patent clause is revised by deleting the sentence from section 7 of the CPL
Since Eclipse 3.0 (released in 2004), plug-ins are installed and managed as "bundles" using Equinox, an implementation of OSGi. The Eclipse SDK is free and open-source software, released under the terms of the Eclipse Public License, although it is incompatible with the GNU General Public License.
Eclipse Public License (EPL) The EPL is a permissive license that allows users to use, modify, and distribute the code without many restrictions. However, it does require that any changes made to the code must be clearly marked as such, and that a copy of the Eclipse Public License be included with the code. Boost Software License
