Ad
related to: concurring opinion lawA Lawyer Will Answer in Minutes! Questions Answered Every 9 Seconds.
Search results
People also ask
What is a concurring opinion?
How does a judge write a concurring opinion?
Why does a Supreme Court justice write a concurring opinion?
Are concurring opinions legally binding?
A concurring opinion is an opinion that agrees with the majority opinion but does not agree with the rationale behind it. Instead of joining the majority, the concurring judge will write a separate opinion describing the basis behind their decision. Concurring opinions are not binding since they did not receive the majority of the court’s ...
In law, a concurring opinion is in certain legal systems a written opinion by one or more judges of a court which agrees with the decision made by the majority of the court, but states different (or additional) reasons as the basis for their decision. When no absolute majority of the court can agree on the basis for deciding the case, the ...
Jan 8, 2015 · Noun. A written opinion filed by a judge which agrees with the majority decision, but which expresses his or her different reasons for the decision, or a different view of the facts of the case, or of the law. Definition of Concur. Verb. A group of people acting together to achieve a common result.
May 4, 2022 · May 04, 2022. How to Read a U.S. Supreme Court Opinion. Reading a U.S. Supreme Court opinion can be intimidating. The average opinion includes 4,751 words, and is one of approximately 75 issued each year. It might be reassuring, however, to know that opinions contain similar parts and tend to follow a similar format.
Concurring Opinions. If a Justice agrees with the outcome of a case but not the reasoning, they may write a concurring opinion. This explains the alternative grounds on which they reached the same conclusion as the majority or plurality.
Justice Clarence Thomas authored an opinion concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. Justice Thomas noted that the general case-by-case rule described by the majority is subject to historical, categorical exceptions.
