Search results
Linnaeus’ work on the classification of man forms one of the 18th-century roots of modern scientific racism. This page aims to look at Linnaeus’ works in detail, both printed and in manuscript, to trace the development of an idea which became fundamental in the history of anthropology and has had devastating and far-reaching consequences ...
Aug 6, 2020 · Tensions were already high from a global pandemic and countrywide protests against institutional racism. The ensuing debate at times devolved into a discussion of whether science should be politically correct — as if there was a trade-off between conducting science and not offending people.
- Brian Lovett
May 7, 2021 · Proponents of one assert that Linnaeus was the first to formulate the doctrine of “scientific racism”, from which Sweden’s “race biology” and present-day forms of racism are in the direct line of descent. Those who follow the other school deny that Linnaeus was racist and believe that everything can be explained by his being “a child of his time”.
Mar 19, 2021 · How Scientific Taxonomy Constructed the Myth of Race. Botanist Carl Linnaeus’ classification system has been adopted around the globe—but have we adequately reckoned with how his ideas about humans laid the groundwork for scientific racism? By Brittany Kenyon-Flatt. 19 Mar 2021. Hiroshi Watanabe/Getty Images. .
The scientific classification established by Carl Linnaeus is requisite to any human racial classification scheme. In the 19th century, unilineal evolution , or classical social evolution, was a conflation of competing sociologic and anthropologic theories proposing that Western European culture was the acme of human socio-cultural evolution.
Aug 10, 2023 · And while Linnaeus’s classification of humanity is a known origin point for modern scientific racism, Broberg rather flippantly dismisses this concern, writing that “labels such as ‘racism’ and ‘racist’ are frequently misleading when applied to circumstances and people in the past.”
