Search results
Apr 20, 2012 · Complete information on incidence, severity, duration, frequency and method of reporting of adverse effects was included in only one RCT. Conflicts of interests were not mentioned by the majority of authors. Conclusions: Adverse effects are poorly reported in recent RCTs of chiropractic manipulations.
People also ask
Does chiropractic care increase the risk of injury?
Can chiropractic manipulative therapy help patients with acute low back pain?
What is the risk of injury in the chiropractic cohort?
The Chiropractic Hospital-based Interventions Research Outcomes (CHIRO) study: a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of clinical practice guidelines in the medical and chiropractic management of patients with acute mechanical low back pain.
Apr 20, 2012 · Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were considered, if they tested chiropractic manipulations against any control intervention in human patients suffering from any type of clinical condition. The selection of studies, data extraction, and validation were performed independently by two reviewers.
- Edzard Ernst, Paul Posadzki
- 2012
Feb 2, 2015 · Among subjects who saw a chiropractic physician, the likelihood of injury was increased in those with a chronic coagulation defect, inflammatory spondylopathy, osteoporosis, aortic aneurysm and dissection, or long-term use of anticoagulant therapy. Conclusions.
- James M Whedon, Todd A Mackenzie, Reed B Phillips, Jon D Lurie
- 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000725
- 2015
- 2015/02/02
Jun 1, 2017 · Abstract. Background. Unlike pharmacological randomized controlled trials (RCTs), manual-therapy RCTs do not always report adverse events (AEs). The few manual-therapy RCTs that provide information on AEs are frequently without details, such as the type and-, severity of the AE and reason for withdrawal. Objective.
- Aleksander Chaibi, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Peter J. Tuchin, Michael Bjørn Russell
- 41.3 ± 11.3 (19-63)
- 2017
- 83 (29)
Comprehensive reporting of adverse events in clinical trials could allow for accurate incidence estimates through meta-analysis. However, it is not clear if randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that involve SMT are currently reporting adverse events adequately.
Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have reported different conclusions about the effectiveness of SMT. Objective To systematically review studies of the effectiveness and harms of SMT for acute (≤6 weeks) low back pain.