Exclusive Focus on Small Business: NFIB stands for America’s small and independent businesses. This sole focus distinguishes us from other business organizations in the country.
The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) is the largest small business association in the U.S. It is headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, with offices in Washington, D.C., and all 50 state capitals.
NFIB is the voice of small business, advocating on behalf of America’s small and independent business owners, both in Washington, D.C., and in all 50 state capitals. NFIB is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and member-driven. Since our founding in 1943, NFIB has been exclusively dedicated to small and independent businesses, and remains so today.
National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), the largest political advocacy organization in the United States that represents small and independent businesses. NFIB was founded in 1943, and it provides resources to small business owners and managers and works to influence national and state public policy.
People also ask
Is the NFIB really voice for small businesses?
Are NFIB dues tax deductible?
Is NFIB legit?
What does NFIB stand for?
"For years, groups like the US Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) succeeded in portraying the consensus position of the “small business community” as staunchly favoring lower tax rates on top income earners and corporations.
The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) is a lobbying organization with offices in Washington, D.C., and in all 50 state capitals. NFIB is a nonpartisan, nonprofit association of 350,000 small business owners across the country.
Oct 04, 2012 · The National Federation of Independent Business has said that will cost 700,000 jobs,” Romney said. In fact, NFIB isn’t all that innocuous — it’s actually a conservative lobbying organization. The...
U.S. Department of Labor Partners with National Federation of Independent Business to Promote Compliance Assistance. Working Partners for an Alcohol- and Drug-Free Workplace . DOL's initiative to raise awareness about the hazard of workplace substance abuse and help employers and employees create drug-free workplaces.
- See Also
- External Links
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, also known as the Affordable Care Act(ACA) or Obamacare, was enacted with the primary aim of expanding health insurance coverage to more people. To that end, the law required most individuals to acquire and maintain minimum health coverage or be penalized. It also required states to expand eligibility for their Medicaid programs to all individuals with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty level. If the state refused to expand, the law said that the federal government could completely withhold its portion of Medicaid funding from the state. Less than two months after the law was enacted, a federal lawsuit was filed in Florida, consisting of 26 states, two individuals, and an independent organization. The following plaintiffs joined: The Attorneys General of Arizona, Indiana, Mississippi, Nevada, North Dakota, Alabama, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas,...
On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court overturned the judgment of the Eleventh Circuit in a 5-4 decision. The majority opinion was written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined in part by Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan. The Court upheld the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate as a legitimate exercise of Congress' Article I power to lay and collect taxes, concluding that the penalty is a tax. Chief Justice John Robertswrote, "The court today holds that our Constitution protects us from federal regulation under the Commerce Clause so long as we abstain from the regulated activity. But from its creation, the Constitution has made no such promise with respect to taxes." The court held, however, that Congress did not have such authority under the Commerce Clause. The court also concluded that, by cutting off all Medicaid funding to states that refused to expand the program, the federal government was engaging in coercion. The court...
Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alitodissented. The dissenting opinion did concur that the individual mandate was not a legitimate regulation of interstate commerce, because it compelled people to engage in particular transactions rather than regulating existing transactions: "the mere fact that we all consume food and are thus, sooner or later, participants in the 'market' for food, does not empower the Government to say when and what we will buy. That is essentially what this Act seeks to do with respect to the purchase of health care." The dissenters argued that the individual mandate represented an unprecedented abuse of federal power, for the federal government has "never before used the Commerce Clause to compel entry into commerce." However, the dissenting opinion also argued that the individual mandate was not a legitimate exercise of the power to tax, because the statute described the fine as a "penalty" rather than a tax. The opinion a...Supreme Court of the United States, "National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius"The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, "A Guide to the Supreme Court’s Decision on the ACA’s Medicaid Expansion"Oyez, "National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Sebelius"