Search results
Mar 25, 2022 · Despite the opposing stance from educational institutions worldwide, Wikipedia can be considered a legitimate research source because of its thoroughness and vast explanations on major topics; its ability to supply information with reliable sources according to their policy, and its vast number of bots and administrators that implement official ...
People also ask
Is Wikipedia a good Encyclopedia?
When should you use Wikipedia for research?
Is Wikipedia a good source for a research paper?
Can wikipedia be used as a secondary source in a research paper?
- A Slightly Longer "Nutshell" Summary
- Overview of Wikipedia
- Notable Strengths of Wikipedia
- Notable Weaknesses of Wikipedia
- Article Quality in Wikipedia
- Editorial Administration, Oversight and Management
- Use Multiple Independent Sources
- Examine An Article's History
- Internal Links
- Categories
For the most part, Wikipedia has similar strengths and weaknesses to any other encyclopedia.Major additional strengths:Major additional weaknesses:In a wiki, articles are never "finished". They are continually edited and (usually) improved over time. In general this results in an upward trend of quality and a growing consensus over a fair and balanced representation of information. Users should be aware that not all articles are of encyclopedic quality from the start. Indeed, many articles st...
Wikipedia has certain advantages over other reference works. Being web-based and having a very large number of active writers and editors, it provides fast coverage of many topics and provides hyperlinking, unavailable in traditional media. Also, it often provides access to subject matter that is otherwise inaccessible in non-native languages. Sinc...
Wikipedia's most dramatic weaknesses are closely associated with its greatest strengths. Wikipedia's radical openness means that any given article may be, at any given moment, in a bad state: for example, it could be in the middle of a large edit or it could have been recently vandalized. While blatant vandalismis usually easily spotted and rapidly...
Wikipedia is a wiki—a collaborative, open-source medium. Just as human knowledge evolves, so does our wiki coverage of it. Wiki articles are continually edited and improved over time, and in general this results in an upward trend of quality and a growing consensus over a fair balanced representation of information. It will tend to gain citations, ...
The Wikipedia community is largely self-organising, so that anyone may build a reputation as a competent editor and become involved in any role they may choose, subject to peer approval. Individuals often will choose to become involved in specialized tasks, such as reviewing articles at others' request, watching current edits for vandalism, or watc...
Because Wikipedia is licensed under the GFDL, its content is often reproduced, especially online. Researchers should be especially careful of the FUTON bias("Full Text On the Net" bias) and ensure that a second article appearing to confirm a Wikipedia article is not (for example) simply a copy of an earlier version. One place to look for additional...
The process of creating Wikipedia is radically open. As a result, unlike most reference works, it is possible that, even for a generally excellent and stable article, the latest version at any given moment may have been subject to recent edits which are not of the same quality as the rest of the article. However, unlike most reference works, you ca...
Wikipedia breathes new life into one of the initial dreams of the World Wide Web: hyperlinks. Hyperlinks allow Wikipedia authors to link any word or phrase to another Wikipedia article, often providing annotations of great value. Background information to an article no longer needs to be limited or even produced by the author of the article. This m...
Wikipedia has had its own user defined category system (folksonomy) since the beginning of 2004. The category system is a collaborative categorization system using freely chosen keywords by all contributors to Wikipedia. This feature allows researchers to navigate Wikipedia via categories, which can be very useful. Virtually all articles now have s...
Nov 3, 2019 · Anyone can check out those citations to learn more about a subject, or verify that those sources actually say what a particular Wikipedia entry claims they do—that is, if you can find those ...
Wikipedia's scope includes all human knowledge, so we have articles about topics as diverse as science, local history, and popular culture. Volunteers write Wikipedia articles as summaries of the best information on a topic, by summarizing the information found in reliable publications.
Feb 17, 2020 · The same year, another influential Wikipedia editor, Eugene Izhikevich, launched Scholarpedia, an invitation-only, peer-reviewed online encyclopedia with a focus on the sciences.
Which of the following is true regarding the traditional peer review process: Under single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer. For either type of review, authors are not directly informed of the identities of the reviewers.
