Search results
- Generated by AI
Creating an answer for you using AI...
Loading... Jun 25, 2007 · In Morse v. Frederick, the majority acknowledged that the Constitution affords lesser protections to certain types of student speech at school or at school-supervised events. It found that Frederick message was, by his own admission, not political, as was the case in Tinker.
People also ask
What is Morse v Frederick?
Did Morse violate Frederick's constitutional rights?
Where can I find the text of Morse v Frederick?
What did Deborah Morse ask Frederick?
Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007), is a United States Supreme Court case where the Court held, 5–4, that the First Amendment does not prevent educators from prohibiting or punishing student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use.
Morse v. Frederick: The First Amendment permits schools to ban students from showing messages promoting the use of illegal drugs at school events.
Searches related to What is the summary of Morse v Frederick?
Brief Fact Summary. Joseph Frederick (P) , a public school student, was suspended by the principal Deborah Morse (D) for displaying a banner on which was written “Bong Hits 4 Jesus”, bong being slang for marijuana, at a school event which was covered by television. He sued the Principal.
Principal Deborah Morse asked Frederick to take the banner down because she believed it promoted illegal drug use. When Frederick refused, Morse confiscated the banner and suspended him. Frederick sued, claiming his First Amendment rights were violated.
Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. __, 127 S. Ct. 2618 (2007) School authorities do not violate the First Amendment when they stop students from expressing views that may be interpreted as promoting illegal drug use.
Mar 19, 2007 · The district court granted summary judgment for Morse and the Juneau School Board, holding that Morse’s actions had not violated Frederick’s constitutional rights, and that, even if constitutional rights violations had occurred, Morse and the School Board were entitled to qualified immunity.
