Search results
Zhu and Greenstein then identified some 4,000 articles that appeared in both Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia, and determined how many of each of these code words were included, in an effort ...
3 days ago · The New Encyclopedia Britannica by Encyclopaedia Britannica (Compiled by) Call Number: AE5 .E363 2010. ISBN: 9781593398378. Publication Date: 2009-09-01. Almost every student, faculty member, and librarian knows from experience how valuable Wikipedia can actually be when looking for quick background information about almost any topic.
- David C. Murray
- 2015
People also ask
Is Wikipedia more accurate than Britannica?
How accurate is wikipedia?
Is Wikipedia more biased than Britannica?
Does Wikipedia have more errors than Britannica?
Jan 24, 2011 · In 2005, the peer-reviewed journal Nature asked scientists to compare Wikipedia's scientific articles to those in Encyclopaedia Britannica—"the most scholarly of encyclopedias," according to its ...
- Who Is More Objective?
- Rinsing Out Bias
- Room For Both?
But is objectivity better achieved by considering one viewpoint or thousands? Along with cowriter Shane Greenstein of Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management, Zhu asks that question in a new paper, Do Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopædia Britannica and Wikipedia. Zhu and Greenstein have long been i...
Perhaps the most interesting finding of Zhu and Greenstein's research is that the more times an article is revised on Wikipedia, the less bias it is likely to show—directly contradicting the theory that ideological groups might self-select over time into increasingly biased camps. "The data suggests that people are engaging in conversation with eac...
As for Britannica, though its experts may be somewhat vindicated by Zhu and Greenstein's findings overall, the editors are still not found to be more objective than the crowd in articles that are sufficiently revised. If the company would like to stay relevant, Zhu suggests, then perhaps it should focus on niche articles on topics not likely to be ...
Opinions on accuracy were almost equal between the two encyclopedias (6 favoring Britannica, 7 favoring Wikipedia, 5 stating they were equal), and eleven of the eighteen (61%) found Wikipedia somewhat or substantially more complete, compared to seven of the eighteen (39%) for Britannica. The survey did not attempt a random selection of the ...
Dec 16, 2005 · Dec. 16, 2005 6:29 a.m. PT. 3 min read. Wikipedia is about as good a source of accurate information as Britannica, the venerable standard-bearer of facts about the world around us, according to a ...
Aug 2, 2012 · In 2005, Nature famously reported that Wikipedia articles on scientific topics contained just four errors per article on average, compared to three errors per article in the online edition of Encyclopaedia Britannica. Britannica objected to the report, but Nature stood by it, and the report remains widely cited today.
