Search results
Mar 15, 2022 · Personality. What Kind of Person Can Resist Corruption? New research finds our moral commitment impacts how we react. Posted March 15, 2022 | Reviewed by Gary Drevitch. Key points. Moral...
- ESSEC Business School
Mar 14, 2022 · Abraham et al 17 found that the counterfeit self - A form of mental corruption of the self that results in the feeling of separation from the true self - is a strong predictor of corrupt behavior and moral disengagement, although this finding was not derived from a study as elaborate as the present study.
- 10.2147/PRBM.S351941
- 2022
- Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022; 15: 637-663.
Stephen Gardiner’s definition of the concept of moral corruption is outlined, and it is proposed to reformulate it, inspired by Kant’s account of “radical evil”. It is argued that moral corruption is a self-deceptive form of trying to maintain one’s convenient status quo.
Jan 11, 2022 · In line with arguments of other moral self-regulatory perspectives (e.g., [34, 49, 50]), moral commitment is associated with the following main characteristics and implications for corrupt behavior. First, moral commitment reflects a steadfast adherence to moral values.
Mar 24, 2018 · Self-deception brings about a consequence, the doctors experience moral erosion, a moral disengagement phenomenon, especially when habituation takes place; the doctors could repeatedly tell lies to the insurance company on behalf of humanity or medical morality.
Oct 20, 2013 · Corruption rarely passes the utilitarian examination of a welfare-based ethical perspective. According to utilitarian scholars, an action is morally permissible if the resulting consequences create more benefit than cost, more happiness than sadness, or more pleasure than pain (Sandel, 2009).
People also ask
Is moral corruption self-deceptive?
Is corruption morally permissible?
What does Stephen Gardiner say about moral corruption?
Is there a correlation between proneness to moral emotions and corruption?
Aug 18, 2016 · Does undercover police work inevitably wrong its targets? Or are undercover activities justified by a general security benefit? In this article I argue that people can make themselves liable to deception and manipulation.
