Search results
Rating
- Continuing to chronicle the voyeuristic misdeeds of the villainous Gerald (Neville Archambault), 14 Cameras is another pointless exercise that equates sliminess with terror. The film is creepy, all right, but not in a way that proves remotely edifying.
www.hollywoodreporter.com › movies › movie-reviews
People also ask
Is 14 cameras a good movie?
What is 14 cameras?
What's wrong with 14 cameras?
Is 14 cameras a sequel to 13 cameras?
Jul 27, 2018 · Rated: 4/5 May 1, 2019 Full Review Maitland McDonagh Film Journal International The sequel to the 2015 high-tech peeping Tom thriller '13 Cameras' takes the premise up a notch with genuinely ...
- (37)
- Horror, Mystery & Thriller
- Seth Fuller, Scott Hussion
14 Cameras Reviews. All Critics. Top Critics. All Audience. Verified Audience. C.H. Newell Father Son Holy Gore. 14 Cameras reflects the fears we have about urbanism, all the anxious...
Jul 26, 2018 · ’14 Cameras’: Film Review. The creepy high-tech voyeur Gerald returns in '14 Cameras,' the sequel to Victor Zarcoff's 2015 horror film '13 Cameras.' By Frank Scheck. July 26, 2018...
Jul 23, 2018 · 14 CAMERAS is the sequel of '13 Cameras' and the slumlord is still in action. This time, he's really turned his crimes into a business. Full review here >.
20 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote. Permalink. 5/10. Good sequel with some suspenseful moments. mudvayne-90245 31 October 2018. I don't think this movie deserves the low 1 and 2 scores it has been given. This movie has decent suspense and is a good follow on from the first one.
Jul 27, 2018 · Horror Movie Review. 14 Cameras – Review. Horror, Thriller | 90 min. Release Date: 27 Jul, 2018. Country: USA. Alternate Title: I See You (UK) Genre: Horror, Thriller. Language: English. Parental Guidance: Moderate female nudity showing bare breasts and bare buttocks, moderate violence, threat, scenes of drug use, moderate profanity.
The film has a 22% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on nine reviews. [3] Frank Scheck of The Hollywood Reporter gave the film a negative review and wrote, "Voyeurism has never been so boring." [2]
