Search results
Aššur-etil-ilāni, also spelled Ashur-etel-ilani [3] and Ashuretillilani [4] ( Neo-Assyrian cuneiform: Aššur-etil-ilāni, [5] [6] meaning " Ashur is the lord of the Tree"), [7] was the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire from the death of his father Ashurbanipal in 631 BC to his own death in 627 BC. [n 1] Aššur-etil-ilāni is an obscure ...
- 627 BC
- Ashurbanipal
- 631–627 BC
- Sîn-šar-iškun
Aššur-etil-ilāni, also spelled Ashur-etel-ilani and Ashuretillilani (Neo-Assyrian cuneiform: Aššur-etil-ilāni, meaning "Ashur is the lord of the Tree"), was the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire from the death of his father Ashurbanipal in 631 BC to his own death in 627 BC. Aššur-etil-ilāni is an obscure figure with a brief reign from ...
A frequently suggested possibility is that Ana-Tašmētum-taklāk was the queen of Aššur-etil-ilāni or Sîn-šar-iškun and as such one of the last Assyrian queens. [3] [4] [6] [7] It is known that both Aššur-etil-ilāni and Sîn-šar-iškun were married, as queens are attested for both of them in administrative documents, though no known ...
- Ana-Tašmētum-taklāk
Aššur-etil-ilāni was succeeded by his brother Sîn-šar-iškun under uncertain, though not necessarily violent, circumstances. Background and chronology There is a distinct lack of available sources in regards to the last few years of Ashurbanipal 's reign and the reign of Aššur-etil-ilāni.
Libbāli-šarrat was presumably the mother of Ashurbanipal's immediate successors, Aššur-etil-ilāni (r. 669–631 BC) and Sîn-šar-iškun (r. 669–631 BC), given that sons born of Ashurbanipal's lower-ranking wives, such as a son by the name of Ninurta-sharru-usur, appear to not have played any political roles.
- Libbāli-šarrat
- Ashurbanipal
- After 631 BC
Ashur-etil-ilani, also spelled Ashur-etel-ilani and Ashuretillilani (Neo-Assyrian cuneiform: Aššur-etil-ilāni, meaning "Ashur is the lord of the Tree"), was the king of the Neo-Assyrian Empire from the death of his father Ashurbanipal in 631 BC to his own death in 627 BC. Ashur-etil-ilani is an obscure figure with a brief reign from which few inscriptions survive. Because of this lack of ...
They might also refer to some activities of Aššur-etil-ilāni (630?– 627?/623?), who was recognized in Babylon, or Sin-šarra-iškun (627?–612), although he never captured Babylon. More likely they refer to Sennacherib whose actions against Babylon and Akkad are speciijically mentioned in rev. 2–12.
Related searches
