Search results
in Lancet Psychiatry highlighting four revolutionary books that were incorporated into anti-psychiatry, a term promoted by David Cooper. The history of anti-psychiatry tends to be ignored in mainstream psychiatric journals and needs to be set in context, because it is often regarded as an embarrassing hangover from the 1960s–70s.
The anti-psychiatric movement received a lot of attention in the 1970s but is now considered to be of the past and of likely interest to the psychiatric historian. However, the impact of the movement on current psychiatric practice requires further re-examination and appraisal.
Oct 1, 2020 · How would you briefly define anti-psychiatry now? Has this definition changed at all for you since you first heard of it? “Anti-psychiatry” is a broad label that’s applied to...
Aug 28, 2022 · This chapter examines the key players in the movement: RD Laing, David Cooper, and their colleagues; Thomas Szasz; Erving Goffman; Michel Foucault; and Franco Basaglia. It concludes by assessing the significance and legacy of the antipsychiatry movement, and the reasons for its rise and fall.
Feb 1, 2020 · The anti-psychiatry movement focused on the dangers and abuses of involuntary hospitalization and treatment, the pitfalls of labeling and diagnosis, and psychiatry’s narrow focus on the biomedical aspects of mental disorder.
A history of antipsychiatry in four books. Psychiatry had good reason to feel pleased with itself 60 years ago. The effectiveness of psychoanalysis for neurotic disorders was still unchallenged and we were just reaping the benefits of two revolutionary new drug treatments.
Definition. Unfortunately, a clear, concise definition of “anti-psychiatry” is elusive. Since David Cooper popularized the term almost half a century ago, many of those who were alleged to be leading theoreticians of the “anti-psychiatry movement” in the 1960s and 1970s have vigorously repudiated that label.
