Yahoo Web Search

Search results

  1. Nov 28, 2013 · Everyone's life is correct. Unless of course you’re a Buddhist or a cat, in which case everyone has multiple lives and both would be correct, depending on context. Besides, ‘everyone’ may be grammatically singular, but it is semantically plural and acts in plural ways in many contexts.

  2. Everyone is a singular word with no plural. It means "each person" or "every person". So, just like these two word expressions, words associated with everyone, or everybody, should be singular. "Everyone's life" is therefore the correct answer. Interestingly, "everyone's lives" actually sounds right to our ears.

  3. People also ask

  4. Is it “Everyones life” or Everyones Lives”? “Everyones life” is correct because “everyone” is a singular word. Everyones life is valuable. Is it “Saving lifes” or “Saving Lives”?

    • 8 min
  5. 57.6k 76 260 380. asked Dec 2, 2010 at 1:59. Joe Casadonte. 503 1 4 5. Good question. This is not answerable using Wiktionary (they don't have those words). – Peter Mortensen. Nov 25, 2015 at 20:06. Add a comment. 2 Answers. Sorted by: 55. As Robusto says, you should use everyones. Neither everyones’ nor everyones is a word.

  6. May 15, 2007 · If neither God nor a soul exists, then, by this view, everyones life is meaningless. On the other hand, there is moderate supernaturalism, according to which spiritual conditions are necessary for a great or ultimate meaning in life, although not meaning in life as such.

  7. So, if your intention is to refer to an individual who lost his or her life whilst saving the lives of more than one others, then the second is correct and the first incorrect. They is singular in this context, so you should use the singular, life .

  8. Mar 11, 2022 · Everyones life is precious. The reason we add an apostrophe s is that everyone is singular and can’t be pluralised (we can’t say everyones ). If we could make everyone plural with an s, then everyones’ would be acceptable.

  1. People also search for