Search results
Juan Luis Vives March (Latin: Joannes Lodovicus Vives, lit. 'Juan Luis Vives'; Catalan: Joan Lluís Vives i March; Dutch: Jan Ludovicus Vives; 6 March 1493 – 6 May 1540) was a Spanish scholar and Renaissance humanist who spent most of his adult life in the southern Hapsburg Netherlands.
- Study of the psyche
- Renaissance humanism
Jan 12, 2009 · Juan Luis Vives (1493–1540) was a Spanish humanist and educational theorist who strongly opposed scholasticism and made his mark as one of the most influential advocates of humanistic learning in the early sixteenth century.
May 2, 2024 · Juan Luis Vives was a Spanish humanist and student of Erasmus, eminent in education, philosophy, and psychology, who strongly opposed Scholasticism and emphasized induction as a method of inquiry. Vives left Spain at the age of 17 to avoid the Inquisition. After studies at Paris (1509–12), he was.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
May 8, 2018 · Valencia, Spain, 6 March 1492; d. Bruges, Netherlands [now Belgium], 6 May 1540), education, philosophy, psychology. Probably born to Jewish parents who adopted Catholicism in the oppressive religious atmosphere of fifteenth-century Spain, 1 Vives became one of the greatest Catholic humanists of sixteenth-century Europe.
Juan Luis Vives was a towering figure of the Renaissance, a man of immense learning, integrity, and originality, yet he still remains very little known, even to the scholarly world. Bibliographies
People also ask
Who was Juan Luis Vives?
Who was Juan Luis Vives March?
Why did Juan Luis Vives leave Spain?
What did Juan Luis Vives believe in?
Juan Luis Vives. (1492—1540) scholar. Quick Reference. (1493–1540) Spanish humanist and scholar. Owing to the perturbed state of Europe Vives lived in many places, including Paris and Oxford, although often based at Bruges, where his Stoic teaching and hostility to Aristotle were largely tolerated.
Oct 28, 2022 · Juan Luis Vives (1492/3-1540) was a Spanish-born humanist who spent the greater part of his life in the Low Countries. He strongly opposed scholasticism and made his mark as one of the most influential advocates of humanistic learning in the early sixteenth century. His bent was philosophical rather than philological.
