Search results
Reasonable Doubts: Created by Robert Singer. With Mark Harmon, Marlee Matlin, William Converse-Roberts, Tim Grimm. A drama about the working relationship between Assistant DA Tess Kaufman, a prosecutor sensitive to the rights of the accused, and hard-charging, gruff Detective Dicky Cobb, an old-fashioned cop with a "bust-the-perps" attitude.
- (481)
- 1991-09-26
- Crime, Drama
- 60
NBC. Release. September 26, 1991. ( 1991-09-26) –. April 27, 1993. ( 1993-04-27) Reasonable Doubts is an American police drama television series created by Robert Singer, which broadcast in the United States by NBC that ran from September 26, 1991, to April 27, 1993.
- 44
- September 26, 1991 –, April 27, 1993
- 2
- NBC
- What Is Reasonable Doubt?
- Understanding Reasonable Doubt
- Difference Between Belief and Certainty
- Unreasonable Doubt
- Exculpatory Evidence
- Other Standards of Proof
- Presumption of Innocence
- The Bottom Line
- GeneratedCaptionsTabForHeroSec
Reasonable doubt is legal terminology referring to insufficient evidence that prevents a judge or jury from convicting a defendant of a crime. It is the traditional standard of proof that must be exceeded to secure a guilty verdict in a criminal case in a court of law. In a criminal case, it is the job of the prosecution to convince the jury that t...
Under U.S. law, a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty. Reasonable doubt stems from insufficient evidence. If it cannot be proved without a doubt that the defendant is guilty, that person should not be convicted. Verdicts do not necessarily reflect the truth, they reflect the evidence presented. A defendant’s actual innocence or gui...
It isn't unusual for a juror to believe that the defendant is a criminal but not be convinced with certainty that they committed the particular crime they are charged with. That isn't good enough to find the defendant guilty. Reasonable doubt comes from certainty rather than belief. Belief and instinct are important in many instances in life but ca...
The reasonable doubt standard forces jurors to ignore doubts considered unreasonable when determining if a defendant is guilty. Unreasonable doubt, which often stems from the possibility that nonexistent or unpresented evidence might explain a defendant's actions and lead to exoneration, is not enough to acquit the defendant.
Evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial can also create reasonable doubt as to whether the accused committed the crime. The defendant's team should not be viewed with more skepticism than the prosecutor's team. Each shred of evidence should be given the same consideration. This is important as any reasonable doubt, however small, th...
Other commonly used standards of proof in criminal cases are: 1. Probable Cause: A requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that the police have more than just suspicionthat a suspect committed a crime before making an arrest, conducting a search, or serving a warrant. 2. Reasonable Belief and Reasonable Suspicion: A reasonable presumption by a po...
The criminal justice system seeks to unearth the truth, convict the guilty, and let the innocent walk free. In order for this to work, each juror must walk into the courtroom presuming the accused is innocent. This presumption requires that jurors have a skeptical mindset that must be overcome before they can reach a guilty verdict. The jurors must...
Reasonable doubt is an important legal standard that strives to prevent innocent people from getting convicted for a crime they didn’t commit. If it cannot be proved without a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty, then they should not be convicted of the crime as charged.
Reasonable doubt is the highest standard of proof in criminal cases, meaning that the evidence must establish the defendant's guilt beyond any reasonable doubt. Learn how to prove reasonable doubt, the difference between belief and certainty, and the three burdens of proof in criminal law.
- Daniel Liberto
Reasonable doubt is a legal term that means a doubt about the guilt of a criminal defendant that arises or remains upon fair and thorough consideration of the evidence or lack thereof. Learn how to use this term in a sentence and see related articles and entries.
A reasonable doubt is not a doubt based upon sympathy or prejudice and, instead, is based on reason and common sense. Reasonable doubt is logically connected to the evidence or absence of evidence. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt does not involve proof to an absolute certainty.
Dec 16, 2014 · A feeling of uncertainty about the truth, the reality of a situation or presented facts, or nature of something. To be uncertain about a thing; to be undecided in a belief or opinion. Origin. 1175-1225 Old French douter. Reasonable. Acceptable to sound reason or judgment, logical. Origin. 1250-1300 Middle English resonable.
Reasonable Doubt. @ReasonableDoubtPodcast ‧. 11K subscribers ‧ 339 videos. World-renowned criminal defense lawyer Mark Geragos reveals the latest in our nation's most high-profile legal cases.
