Search results
People also ask
What did the Anti-Federalists think of the new constitution?
Why did anti-federalists oppose the Constitution?
Why did the Anti-Federalists ratify the Constitution?
Where did the Anti-Federalists mobilize against the Constitution?
Apr 23, 2024 · This Topic Page concerns the Federalists versus the Anti-Federalists and the struggle for ratification. Generally speaking, the federalists were in favor of ratification of the Constitution, and the Anti-Federalists were opposed. Note the the Anti-Federalists are often referred to as just Antifederalists (without the hyphen).
Those opposed to the Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, while taking too much power away from state and local governments. Many felt that the federal government would be too far removed to represent the average citizen.
As Federalists emerged from the Philadelphia Convention’s eventual success in ratifying the new US Constitution, deep divisions remained among those who feared the Constitution was designed to destroy the democratic autonomy of the individual states that the confederation had enshrined.
Sep 27, 2017 · While each of the Anti-Federalists had their own view for what a new constitution for the United States should look like, they generally agreed on a few things. First, they believed that the new Constitution consolidated too much power in the hands of Congress, at the expense of states.
Opponents of ratification were called Anti-Federalists. Anti-Federalists feared the power of the national government and believed state legislatures, with which they had more contact, could better protect their freedoms.
- OpenStax
- 2016
Largely as a result of pressure in several ratifying conventions, the Federalists promised to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution. (Rhode Island and North Carolina had refused to approve the Constitution until they saw the Bill of Rights in place.)
Share. “Anti-Federalist” describes the philosophical and political position of individuals who, during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 and the subsequent state ratification debates (1787–89), generally opposed the constitution proposed to replace the Articles of Confederation.
