Search results
If you are looking for a different kind of online encyclopedia, try the seven alternatives to Wikipedia listed below. Scholarpedia. Scholarpedia is a site made from the same MediaWiki software as Wikipedia. It almost appears like a mirror site, but there are some significant differences. Scholarpedia is written by, you guessed it, scholars.
- Research Tools
Digital History – An valuable resource for those who seek...
- 101 Web 2.0 Teaching Tools
Dokeos: Dokeos is a learning management system used in more...
- Hacking Knowledge
Browse our collection of more than 8,100 free audio and...
- Research Tools
They found that in general, Wikipedia articles were more biased—with 73 percent of them containing code words, compared to just 34 percent in Britannica. In almost all cases, Wikipedia was more ...
People also ask
Is Wikipedia more accurate than Britannica?
Is Wikipedia a reliable Encyclopedia?
Is Wikipedia better than an encyclopedia?
Is Wikipedia more biased than Britannica?
Apr 24, 2024 · The New Encyclopedia Britannica by Encyclopaedia Britannica (Compiled by) Call Number: AE5 .E363 2010. ISBN: 9781593398378. Publication Date: 2009-09-01. Almost every student, faculty member, and librarian knows from experience how valuable Wikipedia can actually be when looking for quick background information about almost any topic.
- David C. Murray
- 2015
- Encyclopedia Britannica Online. (www.britannica.com) In terms of traditional encyclopedias, this is Wikipedia’s main rival. It contains every current volume of the Encyclopedia Britannica, with easy-to-use search tools.
- World Book Online. (www.worldbookonline.com) This is another traditional encyclopedia that has made the move to the Internet in order to challenge Wikipedia.
- Encyclopedia.com. (www.encyclopedia.com) This is probably Wikipedia’s biggest rival in terms of free online encyclopedias. It draws information from over 100 different encyclopedias, dictionaries, and thesauruses, including The Columbia Encyclopedia, Oxford’s World Encyclopedia, Webster’s New World Dictionary, the Encyclopedia of World Biography, and numerous other trusted publications about medicine, computers, science, and more.
- Infoplease. (www.infoplease.com) This is another free online encyclopedia from Pearson P.L.C., the world’s largest education company and textbook producer.
Reliability of Wikipedia. Article instability and susceptibility to cognitive biases are two potential problem areas in a crowdsourced work like Wikipedia. The reliability of Wikipedia and its user-generated editing model, particularly its English-language edition, has been questioned and tested. Wikipedia is written and edited by volunteer ...
Jan 17, 2017 · Wikipedia has several rules for the content that can appear on the site. These rules exist to keep Wikipedia's knowledge library accurate and consistent. However, the rules also have some negative impacts. Wikipedia has an article about the systemic bias present within articles and in the topics that it includes.
When it comes to choosing between Wikipedia and an encyclopedia, context matters. Depending on the situation, one source may be more appropriate than the other. Examples Of Different Contexts. Academic Research: When conducting academic research, an encyclopedia may be a more reliable source than Wikipedia. This is because encyclopedias are ...
