Search results
People also ask
Why was Charlemagne a big Emperor?
Who declared Charlemagne Roman Emperor?
Who was Charlemagne and what did he do?
What was Charlemagne's greatest impact on European history?
4 days ago · Otto I, also known as Otto the Great, was the first emperor of what is traditionally considered the Holy Roman Empire after Charlemagne. Crowned in 962, his reign is notable for its consolidation of the empire through strong military leadership. Otto the Great defeated the Magyars at the Battle of Lechfeld in 955, which secured the empire’s ...
5 days ago · Frederick Barbarossa is arguably one of the most important German rulers of the Middle Ages, and certainly one of the best known. Still, English-speaking readers have had to wait a long time for a biography of this Holy Roman Emperor.
5 days ago · Charlemagne’s coronation was a significant event in medieval Europe, as it marked the beginning of a new era in European history. It united the Frankish realm and cemented Charlemagne’s status as a ruler. Discuss with students the symbolism of the coronation, such as the crown, the scepter, and the Holy Roman Emperor. 3.
3 days ago · This is somewhat related: «The formation of the Holy Roman Empire was initiated by Charlemagne's coronation as "Emperor of the Romans" in 800, and consolidated by Otto I when he was crowned emperor in 962 by Pope John XII.» Seems that, at least in part, the HRE acctually was holy, roman and an empire.
Trajan: Very successful in expansion/military record. Good in administrative spending as well. Constantine: Ended a huge civil strife that was caused by the Tetrarchy (even if he was a part of the strife to a degree). Legalization and doctrinal unification of Christianity ended up becoming the biggest component of post-Roman Europe's backbone.
4 days ago · Later in the Middle Ages, however, I think these questions became less important. It was accepted until the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453 that there was a ‘Roman’ emperor in the east; there was one in the west from the time of Charlemagne onwards.
You mean why he left the Holy Roman Empire's throne to Ferdinand I and the spanish throne to Philip II? (I would say because during his reign, and the comuneros rebellion, rebels asked Ferdinand to be castilles King because he was castillian, thats why Charles moved him far away to mantain him controlled and then promised him he would give him the HRE throne)
Related searches
